Advertise Here

Eye On Boise

House debates local-option tax issue

Among those speaking in favor of the local-option amendment was Rep. Pat Takasugi, R-Wilder, who said, “I think it’s good for rural, it’s good for urban, and I would urge your support for the amendment.” Said Rep. Wendy Jaquet, D-Ketchum, “Some places in the state might want to put this to their local voters, and some might not want to.” Rep. JoAn Wood, R-Rigby, speaking against the amendment, said, “This amendment is hostile to the original intent of the bill. The original intent of the bill was to provide  a fund for preservation. … It really should have come before our committee as a separate bill, and not an amendment to HB 135.” Rep. Tom Loertscher, R-Iona, said, “You create pockets of taxation whenever you go with this kind of thing.” Rep. Lenore Barrett, R-Challis, said, “This is a forerunner to a tax increase and I don’t care who sanctions it, I oppose tax increase.” Rep. Branden Durst, D-Boise, sponsor of the amendment, said, “We need to not be partisan and we need to find a solution that’s good for Idaho. … We talk a lot about local control in this body, but we’re a little light on affirming it.”

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Eye On Boise

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Betsy Z. Russell covers Idaho news from The Spokesman-Review's bureau in Boise.

Named best state-based political blog in Idaho for 2013 by The Fix

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Eye On Boise.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
Advertise Here