41°Quick links: Valentine photo contest • Washington Legislature • Idaho Legislature • Gonzaga hoops • WSU hoops
Instead of raising more revenue, a fee increase hitting out-of-state hunters and anglers has resulted in less money flowing to the Idaho Fish and Game Department this year. “Usually in Idaho we sell out right away when it comes to our nonresident deer and elk hunters, and at this time we are not sold out and we’re seeing a lag,” said Fish and Game Director Cal Groen. “We have tags left over.”
In a survey, hunters from outside the state cited the fee increase, the poor economy and the state’s growing wolf population as reasons they’re staying away this year. Lawmakers had considered a Fish & Game proposal to charge more for the most popular hunts – a plan intended to raise an extra $7 million a year – but instead approved a more modest increase only on out-of-state residents. If nonresident tag sales held steady this year, the change was expected to net $2.5 million more. That hasn’t happened. Three months into the state’s new fiscal year, revenue from tag sales is 9 percent, or about $1 million, below the same point last year. You can read my full story here at spokesman.com.
Betsy Z. Russell covers Idaho news from The Spokesman-Review's bureau in Boise.
999 W. Riverside, Spokane, WA 99201
P.O. Box 2160, Spokane, WA 99210
Main switchboard: (509) 459-5000 • (800) 338-8801
Newsroom: (509) 459-5400 • (800) 789-0029
Customer service: (800) 338-8801
© Copyright 2010, The Spokesman-Review
tjh on October 23 at 8:48 a.m.
Wolf hunt promotion as overall marketing failure. Serves IDF&G right.
Flag as inappropriate
omaha on October 23 at 10:28 a.m.
If you make something more expensive, less people are going to do it. Go figure!
Flag as inappropriate
ir8papa on October 23 at 12:31 p.m.
It is not only out of state hunters refusing to buy licenses and tags, it is resident hunters as well. I know of numerous hunters in addition to myself, that took our money and purchased out of state tags and licenses in states other than Idaho because of the severe detrimental impact that wolves have had on the big game population in Idaho. And until such time as the wolf population is drastically reduced, I'll continue to spend my $3000-$5000 each year in states that do not have wolves.
Flag as inappropriate
Gary Ingram on October 23 at 6:57 p.m.
“less with more” is a famous saying in No. Idaho.
Flag as inappropriate