Spokane7
33°
The Senate Agricultural Affairs Committee this morning refused to introduce invasive species amendments proposed by the state Department of Agriculture after senators noted that the bill, as written, would authorize pulling over any vehicle for simply having a container - say, a cooler in the back of a pickup - and potentially sending the driver to jail for up to a year, fining him up to $3,000, and hitting him with a civil penalty of up to $10,000. That wasn’t the intent, Administrator of Plant Industries Lloyd Knight told the committee. The amendments were designed to allow citations of people who blow past boat inspection stations on the freeway - as roughly 80 percent of boaters did when they passed the Huetter inspection station on I-90 just west of Coeur d’Alene last year without stopping, Knight said. Highway patrollers pulled over a handful, and were only able to cite them for failure to obey a traffic sign - the sign that said all boats had to stop for inspection for invasive species, such as quagga and zebra mussels.
The legislation Knight proposed would make failure to stop for inspection a misdemeanor for anyone “towing, carrying or transporting any conveyance,” with “conveyance” broadly defined to include a vehicle, a boat, a trailer, a container and more. It also would allow the Department of Agriculture to impound infested conveyances; and allow law enforcement officers to stop, search, detain and impound conveyances. Knight said the Department of Ag made the bill broad so it could apply to any future invasive species, such as, perhaps, one carried on firewood, or one carried in containers of fish. Rules for each inspection program would be more specific, he said.
But Sen. Gary Schroeder, R-Moscow, brought up the cooler-in-a-pickup example - and said it’d fit the language in the bill. “If I’m driving down the road and I have a cooler in the back of my truck and I don’t stop, if you want to, you can throw me in jail and fine me a couple thousand dollars,” he said. “This appears to give the Department of Agriculture the ability to get involved in mischief if they choose to do so. … You’re telling me to trust you.”
Sen. Brent Hill, R-Rexburg, said he rarely votes against printing a bill, but he’d do so in this case. “I think we may even be hinging on some constitutional issues,” he said. The roll-call vote on a motion to introduce the bill failed, 3-5, even after committee Chairman Tim Corder, R-Mountain Home, said a full committee hearing on the bill would include information on the high costs of invasive species infestations, showing why “that might require us to take some extraordinary measures.” Knight said afterward that he’ll work on narrowing the bill and bring back a new version. “We’ll work with them,” Knight said. “I think we can get to a definition that will work for them.”
999 W. Riverside, Spokane, WA 99201
P.O. Box 2160, Spokane, WA 99210
Main switchboard: (509) 459-5000 • (800) 338-8801
Newsroom: (509) 459-5400 • (800) 789-0029
Customer service: (800) 338-8801
© Copyright 2012, The Spokesman-Review
Terms of use • Privacy policy • Copyright policy
TerryHarris on February 09 at 10:49 a.m.
A case of bad bill drafting getting in the way of good policy in Boise.
oldfisherman on February 09 at 2:14 p.m.
I agree with Terry Harris, that is a strong statement that the Ag Dept should not be the overseer, but Parks/Rec should, as they are the licensee of all watercraft. Even our local Legislators (except Eric Anderson) don’t understand the problem, but will when the mussels get into our waterways,, and no one comes to water recreate creating revenue, then maybe they will realize it is a problem. If Ag wants to know why the low participation up in North Idaho, they are directly to blame due to poor and inadqeuate signage from day one. They knew all the answers and were unwilling to accept free help.