Eye On Boise

Parents' rights case a 'difficult' one...

U.S. Ninth Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, right, visits with courtroom attendees during a special sitting of the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit appears on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at the James A. McClure Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Boise, Idaho.  (AP / Charlie Litchfield)
U.S. Ninth Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, right, visits with courtroom attendees during a special sitting of the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit appears on Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at the James A. McClure Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Boise, Idaho. (AP / Charlie Litchfield)

When should a parent lose custody of a young child for refusing consent for a medical procedure? How likely must the harm to the child be for that to happen, and what if the potential harm is unlikely but dire? And should doctors and police who seize custody and perform the procedure over parents' objections bear any liability? Those questions and more are at the heart of a parents' rights case that brought a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to Boise on Tuesday for the first time since 2003, to hold a special sitting to hear arguments on an appeal from parents Corissa and Eric Mueller.

“This is a very difficult case," said Senior Circuit Judge J. Clifford Wallace of San Diego. "We’ve all found it a very difficult case.” You can read my full story here at spokesman.com.
 




You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Eye On Boise
Betsy Z. Russell
Betsy Russell covers Idaho news from the state capitol in Boise and writes the Eye on Boise blog.

Follow Betsy online:








Close

Sections


Profile

Close

Contact the Spokesman

Main switchboard:
(509) 459-5000
(800) 338-8801
Newsroom:
(509) 459-5400
(800) 789-0029
Customer service:
(800) 338-8801