ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here
Archive

Eye On Boise

Idaho ordered to pay another $376K in attorney fees re overturned abortion law

The state of Idaho has again been ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorney's fees after losing a court battle over the Legislature's latest anti-abortion law, the Associated Press reports, with the tab now rising to more than $1 million since 2000. The latest bill comes in a lawsuit over Idaho's fetal pain law and other abortion restrictions; U.S. District Judge Lynn Winmill ruled Thursday that the state owes more than $376,000 to attorneys for Jennie Linn McCormack, who sued over she was charged with a felony last year for allegedly having an illegal abortion. The Pocatello woman won her case last year, overturning several Idaho abortion restrictions.

Idaho won't have to pay that bill immediately because an appeal over some aspects of the case is still pending in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, reports AP reporter Rebecca Boone. If the state wins that appeal, it could reduce the amount it owes McCormack's attorneys. But if Idaho loses, it could result in a double-down of sorts with the state ordered to pay McCormack's appellate costs, as well; click below for Boone's full report.


Idaho ordered to pay $376K over abortion lawsuit
By REBECCA BOONE, Associated Press

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — The state of Idaho has again been ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorney's fees after losing a court battle over the Legislature's latest anti-abortion law.

The latest bill — which comes in a lawsuit over Idaho's so-called fetal pain law and other abortion restrictions — brings the state's total tab to more than $1 million spent defending abortion restriction laws since 2000.

“The sense that I get from people in the office is that the abortion cases are fairly expensive,” said Bob Cooper, spokesman for Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden. “The advocates of the legislation would say that it's a worthwhile expense.”

In the most recent case, U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill ruled on Thursday that the state owed more than $376,000 to attorneys for Jennie Linn McCormack. The Pocatello woman successfully sued and overturned some abortion restrictions last year after she was charged with a felony because police said she had an illegal abortion.

Still, both sides have agreed that Idaho won't have to pay that bill immediately because an appeal over some aspects of the case is still pending in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. If the state wins that appeal, it could reduce the amount it owes McCormack's attorneys. But if Idaho loses, it could result in a double-down of sorts with the state ordered to pay McCormack's appellate costs, as well.

It's a dilemma the Idaho Attorney General's office faces often: Lawmakers pass a law — sometimes even after they're warned it likely won't pass constitutional muster — and a resident eventually sues. When the state loses, the Idaho Attorney General's office usually has to pay the winner's related costs.

Before the McCormack case, the state tallied about $365,000 in its own expenses defending abortion restriction laws in three separate lawsuits since 2000. Idaho had to pay an additional $446,000 in attorneys' fees to the plaintiffs in those three cases, which involved a parental consent law, a partial birth abortion law and a law that would have denied Medicaid coverage for medically necessary abortions.

The Attorney General's office had lower expenses in the McCormack case, about $5,500, in part because the state's attorneys didn't argue over the merits of the fetal pain law. Instead, they focused their defense on challenging whether McCormack's attorney had standing to fight the law.

That's because the state's attorneys had weighed in on the constitutionality of the fetal pain law before it was ever enacted by the Legislature. They found it lacking.

“We did review the statute at the request of a legislator, and basically, we told them the pain-capable unborn child protection act was inconsistent with the viability standard … that it would likely be held unconstitutional,” Cooper said.

It's the Legislature's job to make policy, and the attorney general's responsibility to defend state law in the courts — as long as there is a plausible legal claim to defend, Cooper said.


Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Eye On Boise

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Betsy Z. Russell covers Idaho news from The Spokesman-Review's bureau in Boise.

Named best state-based political blog in Idaho for 2013 by The Fix

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Eye On Boise.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here