ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here
Archive

Eye On Boise

Idaho’s new anti-dairy spying bill brings lawsuit

Here's a news item from the Associated Press: BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A coalition of animal activists, civil rights groups and media organizations is suing Idaho in federal court over a new law that makes it illegal to secretly film animal abuse at agricultural facilities. Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter signed the new law last month, after Idaho's $2.5 billion dairy industry complained that videos showing cows being abused at a southern Idaho dairy unfairly hurt business. The Los Angeles-based animal rights group Mercy for Animals released the videos, which showed workers at Bettencourt Dairy beating, stomping and otherwise abusing cows in 2012. The lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union, Animal Legal Defense Fund, CounterPunch and others asks a judge to strike down the so-called “ag gag” law. A similar lawsuit is underway in Utah over Utah's version of the law.

Click below for a full report from AP reporter Rebecca Boone.


ACLU, others sue Idaho over farm anti-spying law
By REBECCA BOONE, Associated Press

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A coalition of animal activists, civil rights groups and media organizations sued Idaho on Monday over a new law that makes it illegal to secretly film animal abuse at agricultural facilities.

The groups filed the lawsuit in Boise's U.S. District Court, asking a federal judge to strike down what they call an “ag gag” law. The coalition contends that the law curtails freedom of speech and makes gathering proof of animal abuse harsher than the penalty for animal cruelty itself.

Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter signed the law last month after Idaho's $2.5 billion dairy industry complained that videos showing cows being abused at a southern Idaho dairy unfairly hurt business.

The Los Angeles-based animal rights group Mercy For Animals released the videos, which showed workers at Bettencourt Dairy beating, stomping and otherwise abusing cows in 2012.

Proponents of the law say it prevents animal rights groups from unfairly targeting agricultural businesses. Bob Naerebout, who heads the Idaho Dairymen's Association that promoted the measure, said Mercy For Animals unfairly tried to persuade Bettencourt Dairy's customers to stop buying its milk products even after the company fired the five workers who were filmed mistreating cows and cooperated with the prosecution against the employees.

The law says people caught surreptitiously filming agricultural operations face up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine. The law prohibits making audio or video recordings of such operations without first getting permission and criminalizes obtaining records from agricultural operations by force or misrepresentation.

For comparison, a first animal cruelty offense is punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $5,000. A second offense within 10 years of the first conviction carries a penalty of up to nine months in jail and a fine up to $7,000.

The plaintiffs say the law was designed to criminalize whistle-blowers and violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

“The law makes it criminal to document animal welfare, worker safety, and food safety violations at an 'agricultural production facility,' thus 'gagging' speech that is critical of industrial agriculture, including speech that advances significant public interests in protecting Idahoans' safety,” the coalition wrote in the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs are the Animal Legal Defense Fund, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho, the Center for Food Safety, Farm Sanctuary, River's Wish Animal Sanctuary, Western Watersheds Project, Sandpoint Vegetarians, Idaho Concerned Area Residents for the Environment, Idaho Hispanic Caucus Institute for Research and Education, CounterPunch, Farm Forward, Will Potter, James McWilliams, Monte Hickman, Blair Koch and Daniel Hauff. They name both the governor and state Attorney General Lawrence Wasden as defendants.

Wasden's spokesman, Todd Dvorak, said the state's attorneys were still reviewing the lawsuit and couldn't immediately comment.

Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Idaho, said the purpose of the law was to punish animal rights groups and curtail speech.

“When the government tells us what we can observe and document, we lose not only our freedom of speech but also our freedom of thought,” Hopkins said Monday morning during a press conference announcing the lawsuit.

Mercy For Animals released a prepared statement Monday declaring the organization's support for the lawsuit.


  

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Eye On Boise

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Betsy Z. Russell covers Idaho news from The Spokesman-Review's bureau in Boise.

Named best state-based political blog in Idaho for 2013 by The Fix

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Eye On Boise.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here