Advertise Here

Community Comment

Who pays for river rescues when signs warn of danger?

Good morning, Netizens…

[Picture courtesy of KREM-TV]

There is a lot of chatter in the morning news about the “dramatic rescue” of a woman who was kayaking down the Spokane River East of the Barker Street Bridge, which is under repair and got trapped in debris beneath the bridge. The Fire Department finally resorted to cutting a hole in the bridge floor to effect the rescue. Once that was out of the way, and a fireman was lowered down to the stranded kayak, she was pulled to the surface.

I have seen the warning signs along the river, advising boaters to stay out of the river. The river is high, running very fast due to the Spring runoff, and cold. The signs say STAY OUT but this woman and her partner apparently chose to ignore them. There have been a number of these rescues this Spring, each one where rescue workers’ lives were put in peril because someone couldn’t read the warning signs.

So logic prods me to ask, since they ignored official warnings, shouldn’t they be responsible for the costs of their rescue? Send them a bill for services and watch the number of incidents drop. That makes sense to me.


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Community Comment

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Spokesman-Review readers blog about news and issues in Spokane.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Community Comment.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
Advertise Here