Topic Call: Helmet laws, tobacco
In yesterdays blog y'all read my rants about helmet laws and my usual diatribe against tobacco. What if these issues were put to a national vote with a simple pro-viso. To wit: "Those who would vote for the continuation of risky activities would be collectively assigned public debts associated with unfortunate consequences of that behavior". If you were personally faced with the "ayes" pro-rated increased dollar burden for these activities with known health hazards would you vote to retain them, why or why not?
Dave Tolle
DFO: Dave T has thrown down the gauntlet. Any takers?