41°Quick links: Election results • Raceway Park • Reader Halloween pics • City: Zehm tape mislabeled • Swine flu
For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post has offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to “those powerful few”: Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and — at first — even the paper’s own reporters and editors. The astonishing offer was detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he felt it was a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff”/Politico. More here. H/T: Beth Bollinger/Accidental Rabbit Trails
Question: What do you think of that fact that a department at a major newspaper actually entertained the idea of providing access to powerful people for thousands of dollars?
D.F. Oliveria is an associate editor, editorialist, columnist and blogger for The Spokesman-Review. Recently, the Idaho Press Club selected Huckleberries as the best 2008 Idaho newspaper blog. In 2007, the Society of Professional Journalists selected Huckleberries Online as the best news blog in the five-state Pacific Northwest. The print version of Huckleberries is a past winner of the Herb Caen Memorial Tidbits Column contest sponsored by the National Association of Newspaper Columnists. The Readership Institute of Northwestern University has cited this blog as a good example of online community journalism.
999 W. Riverside, Spokane, WA 99201
P.O. Box 2160, Spokane, WA 99210
Main switchboard: (509) 459-5000 • (800) 338-8801
Newsroom: (509) 459-5400 • (800) 789-0029
Customer service: (800) 338-8801
© Copyright 2009, The Spokesman-Review
scootermom on July 02 at 9:53 a.m.
At least they're honest about it.
Flag as inappropriate
Cabbage Boy on July 02 at 9:57 a.m.
Surprisingly candid. Don't think they meant to though, otherwise they wouldn't have “canceled”.
Flag as inappropriate
Phaedrus on July 02 at 9:57 a.m.
Maybe it is the new business model for newspapers.
Flag as inappropriate
redman on July 02 at 10:22 a.m.
Its not a new business model at all its and old one brorrowed from the 70's era TASS and Pravda.
Flag as inappropriate
JamesBond on July 02 at 10:51 a.m.
The liberals who whine all the time about Fox News remind me a lot of the Politburo whining about the western radio broadcasts that could be picked up behind the Iron Curtain.
Flag as inappropriate
Sisyphus on July 02 at 11:03 a.m.
The wingnuts who listen only to Fox News remind me of the zeal of the Hitler Youth.
Flag as inappropriate
Cindy H on July 02 at 11:39 a.m.
First Godwin of the week goes to Sis.
Flag as inappropriate
Sisyphus on July 02 at 11:52 a.m.
Good observation, sugar pop. Should I guide you through the remainder of the comparison? ;-) What should be the equivalent for comparing to communists/socialists? Should we hand out Marxies?
Flag as inappropriate
Charlie on July 02 at 12:37 p.m.
I find the comparison of people who listen to FOX news to Hitler youth rather vapid. Must have struck a live nerve!
Flag as inappropriate
BethB on July 02 at 12:44 p.m.
Update on the WaPo issue: the paper has now canceled the entire event.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/…
Flag as inappropriate
Cabbage Boy on July 02 at 1:01 p.m.
Charlie,
It's what passes for thought/humor on the left bank. I kinda thought the ObamaCorp had some interesting similarities.
Flag as inappropriate
Cabbage Boy on July 02 at 1:01 p.m.
@Beth
They can't retreat fast enough on this blunder.
Flag as inappropriate
BethB on July 02 at 2:47 p.m.
No doubt, CB! They've got their story going - we didn't know we were the only sponsor, blah blah…
Flag as inappropriate
BethB on July 02 at 2:55 p.m.
On news sources.. two things. First, diversify. That's the way to get news from a lot of perspectives and then reach your own conclusion about facts (and nuances therein). Second - and this is sad - I can tell when a friend or family member has gotten a news item from Fox News: the story's outrageous; it's not on Google News (meaning, it's not wide spread); and, after a little digging, it turns out to be either incredibly misleading as to the real facts or, sometimes, it's just out-and-out false. I'm sure some of the Fox News stories can be accurate. But if I can routinely tell when stories come from Fox News because of their outrageous falsities… That's a problem.
I wish there was a solid conservative alternative out there. I do like to get my sources from a lot of places…
Flag as inappropriate
spokelooneh on July 02 at 10:02 p.m.
The WA HO PO fired their only liberal blogger last week. That paper is NOTHING like it was back in the day.
Flag as inappropriate