When resident Dan Gookin -- a recognized city watchdog -- raised concerns about protecting the river access for future public green space, Kennedy insisted Gookin had championed for private development on that same stretch of land before. Gookin denied Kennedy's claim. "You are so grandstanding right now," Kennedy cut in. "That's so false I can't even tell you"/Tom Hasslinger, Press. Full story here.

Question: Who's right -- Kennedy or Gookin? Has Gookin supported the concept of private development on the proposed Education Corridor? Which guy would win in a no-holds-barred cage match?