However, Obama has also drawn some criticism from his own party because of his perceived inactivity during his time in office. Such critics should be careful what they wish for. Perhaps it is a good thing that the president is not constantly stirring controversy, asserting his authority, and pushing his party’s agenda. For a proactive president, it’s hard to beat George W. Bush. Is that what we want — massive policy and program reversals every time the White House changes hands? Don’t underestimate the value of political boredom/Benjamin Ledford, UI Argonaut. More here.

Question: "Saturday Night Live" performed a skit recently in which Obama was portrayed as a president that hasn't gotten anything done, except the Cash for Clunkers program. Do you agree w/that assessment? Would you prefer a president who's more proactive?