Advertise Here

A Matter Of Opinion

Personal reflection for 2008, No. 2

Walking down Lincoln early yesterday afternoon, I heard from behind me the distinctive crunch-crunch sound of a chain-reaction collision. As I wheeled around I saw the driver of the third and final car in the sequence of rear-enders jump out of his door and race around behind his vehicle. Reaching the rear, right door, he jerked it open and bent inside to check on what appeared to be about a 2-year-old child who was secured in a car seat.
I’m an ancient who’s been known to scoff at excessive regulation in our lives and has been heard to say that in my day a “child-restraint system” meant my father’s spring-loaded right arm.
While yesterday’s accident will be a headache for all involved and there will be expenses for repairs, it appeared that all the people — including this child — were OK. If it weren’t for that carseat, though, I’ll bet the outcome would have been much worse.
I think it’s fair to say that the long reach of the regulatory arm serves a valid purpose.

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to A Matter Of Opinion

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

A Matter of Opinion is really a matter of many opinions — those held by the people responsible for the opinion pages of The Spokesman-Review ... and yours. Check in regularly to follow the discussion and help keep it lively.

Joust offline!

We welcome letters to the editor (all are subject to editing). Letters can be sent to:

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
Advertise Here