Archive for December 2010
Last open thread of the year. Make it a good one. What will you miss? What are you happy to leave behind?
Or you could chew on this topic. Mike Huckabee leads this poll of possible GOP candidates for president in 2012.
1. Huckabee. 2. Romney. 3. Gingrich. 4. Palin.
Who do you see emerging from the primary scrum?
As I was researching Expo '74 driver King Cole for today's editorial regarding his death, I got to wondering how he would have handled the task in today's polarized, government-is-the-enemy climate.
He came to Spokane to work for a group of business leaders, the people who typically made things happen in American communities in the middle of the 20th Century. Early on, he reached out to some 190 civic groups and included their grassroots energy in a grand coalition of business, government and civic organizations.
I wonder where the tea party legions would have fit in.
Tuesday’s Opinion page will carry a clarification of Screenwriter David Freed’s Sunday op-ed piece, which first ran in The Los Angeles Times, examined the thinking behind such military decorations as the Congressional Medal of Honor.
In pointing out the influence individual commanders with personal biases have over who gets and doesn’t get a medal, Freed commented: “Witness the fact that not a single African-American soldier received the Medal of Honor in World War II, even though thousands saw combat.”
A couple of readers called to remind us that Vernon Baker, who was living in St. Maries, Idaho, at the time, received the Medal of Honor in 1997 for his heroics as an Army lieutenant in Italy in 1945. Indeed, the Medal of Honor was awarded to Baker and, posthumously, to six other black World War II veterans on July 13, 1997 — not “in” World War II, but half a century after.
So the column was accurate, if incomplete. In fact, the commentary and its subject were incredibly timely, coming on the weekend when the U.S. Senate sealed congressional approval of legislation repealing the odious “don’t ask, don’t tell” law that allows gays and lesbians to serve in the military only as long as they lie about it.
Prior to the early ‘90s, it was believed that of all the wars in which America fought since the Congress Medal of Honor was created in 1861, World War II was the only one in which no black service member received it. In 1996, the news magazine, U.S. News & World Report, identified seven black soldiers whose service records would seem to qualify them for the medal, but a team of military historians was unable to locate any evidence that any of the seven — or any other African-American — had been nominated.
There was unresolved speculation as to why, but it would be hard not to blame the bigotry and political tension that were prevalent in that period. Blacks were allowed to fight, in segregated units under white commanders, but their gallantry was not deemed worthy of recognition.
Similarly, thousands of gays and lesbians have served, many with distinction, only to be turned out because they owned up to their sexual orientation.
Today we recognize the error of how blacks were treated in a segregated military structure. Yet, allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly continues to provoke ludicrous assertions that it would undermine military cohesion and effectiveness.
How long will it be before we look back on 2010 and recognize how mistaken we were?
Another balmy autumn day. Put your thoughts here on whatever issue moves you.
I hear the lull in cold-weather precipitation is about over. Before you rush outside to catch the first flake, take a moment to share any loose-thread opinions that have been accumulating.
Stateline.org reports that authorities in Maricopa County, Ariz., have raided some 40 workplaces in the past two years, looking for undocumented workers. Although Arizona reputedly has the nation’s strictest laws against hiring illegal immigrants, fabled Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s forces have arrested and charged scores of workers, but hardly any employers.
Does that seem right?