Outdoors

Trawlers waste 104 tons of Alaska halibut -- in one week


Halibut are left hanging on a rack to be cleaned by local fishermen in Seward, Alaska. 
 (Carlos Munoz Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
Halibut are left hanging on a rack to be cleaned by local fishermen in Seward, Alaska. (Carlos Munoz Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)

OCEAN FISHING — Last week I reported that Alaska is considering yet another cutback on the halibut limits for sportfishermen.

Here's part of the reason: one commercial cod fishing trawler alone had to dump 43 percent of its recent catch because it was halibut during a closed season.  That's just one boat in one week.

Read on for the Blog report by Anchorage outdoor writer Craig Medred.

AlaskaDispatch/By Craig Medred

The Seattle-based trawler Alaska Beauty recently had a great week of halibut fishing in the Gulf of Alaska, according to the latest reports from the Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Only one problem: Alaska Beauty wasn't supposed to be fishing halibut; it was supposed to be fishing cod.

Despite that, 43 percent of its catch was halibut. All of that halibut, by law, must be dumped back into the sea. Most of it goes back dead. Some Alaskans are starting to get angry at this sort of large “by-catch” of halibut by Pacific Northwest and Kodiak-based trawlers at a time when the species' stocks are declining, and Alaska charter and commercial longline fisheries are locked in a bitter battle over every flatfish.

Against that backdrop, the tolerance of halibut waste in the trawl fishery is wrong, critics say. An anonymous blogger who goes by the name of Tholepin has been hitting back hard at the powerful economic interests that largely run the North Pacific Management Council.

“228,800 pounds of halibut wasted by draggers just last week,” Tholepin notes in the latest post. “Value? In cash terms to longliners, about $1.6 million. In lost reproductive potential, in lost growth potential, in long-term resource damage; all unknowns … but far in excess of the cash value lost. All in one week. Are we sure that is the full extent of the damage? Not at all, as the observer program is badly flawed.”

Alaska Dispatch does not normally cite anonymous blogs, but the numbers and math here are verifiable — as is the observation on observers.

Observers have sought more input to the Council, and so far they have been denied. According to Elizabeth Mitchell of the Association for Professional Observers, the Council now tells the “North Pacific Groundfish Observer Program (NPGOP) essentially how, when, where and what to monitor. Observers no longer monitor the fishery and are no longer an independent source of information to monitor commercial fisheries. They're mostly quota trackers these days.”

The Council has run the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea fisheries almost carte blanche for the past two decades, but it suffered a rare rebuff from NOAA earlier this month. NOAA, the federal agency charged with overseeing the Council, raised serious questions a Council plan to restrict Southcentral charter halibut fisheries.




Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
Rich Landers

Rich Landers’ Outdoors blog


Rich Landers writes and photographs stories for a wide range of outdoors coverage, including a Sunday feature section and a Thursday column. He also writes the Outdoors Blog.


Follow online:


Recent posts


Close

Sections


Profile

Close

Contact the Spokesman

Main switchboard:
(509) 459-5000
(800) 338-8801
Newsroom:
(509) 459-5400
(800) 789-0029
Customer service:
(800) 338-8801