Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Outdoors blog

Court throws book at ‘honest sportsman’ for illegal kill

Bighorn ram. (Jaime Johnson)
Bighorn ram. (Jaime Johnson)

HUNTING -- A big-game hunter says he was harshly punished by a Montana court for coming forward to authorities after making an honest mistake.

The intriguing story from the Valley Press/Mineral Independent will make any hunter cringe in one way or another.

After waiting 30 years to draw a tag for the chance to hunt bighorn sheep, the hunter ended up paying $32,000 for accidentally killing two prized rams and a ewe.

Here's the story:

Hunter hit with costly penalties after mishap

December 28, 2016

By SAM WILSON, Special to the Valley Press

Jeff Fleming wishes he could take back the most expensive three seconds of his life.

On Oct. 28, the Kalispell hunter was convicted by Thompson Falls Justice of the Peace Donald M. Strine of illegally killing two bighorn sheep during a hunting trip in the Knowles Creek area. He says that it was an honest mistake, but one that still wound up costing him more than $32,000 in fines after he self-reported the incident.

“Nobody draws a sheep tag you waited 30 years for and ends up killing three animals intentionally,” Fleming said in an interview last Monday.

On Oct. 28, Fleming was tracking a herd of bighorn sheep at Knowles Creek with his friend and a fellow Kalispell hunter, Brad Borden, when he sighted on a trophy ram.

“I took a shot at my ram, but as soon as I shot that ram, I didn’t know it at the time, it fell into a depression where I couldn’t see it,” Fleming said. He reloaded, peered back through his scope and saw what appeared to be the same animal. “I’m sure he’s wounded, so I shoot him again. When I walked up the hill, I can’t tell you how shocked I was to see three bighorn sheep lying there.”

The second bullet had passed through the second ram and struck an ewe standing in the brush behind it, killing it with a shot to the throat.

Borden then called the game warden, who upon investigating the scene, told the two men that the evidence appeared to corroborate their story. Fleming said the warden even helped the hunters pack out the meat, allowing him to keep the first ram.

“He told me, ‘I gotta charge you for taking a ram, but I can’t charge you for taking an ewe’”, Fleming recalled. “I just thought I was going to pay a fine. I never thought I’d lose my license.”

Fleming pleaded guilty to the offenses. As restitution to the state, he must pay $30,000 for the second ram and $2,000 for the ewe, in addition to a $735 fine for hunting over the limit. He also lost his hunting, trapping and fishing privileges for 30 months.

Judge Strine said in an interview with the Daily Inter Lake that although the game warden corroborated Fleming’s account of the sheep killings, the law gives him no leeway on restitution for those convicted of illegally harvesting animals.

“The law says ‘shall,’ not ‘may,’ so that pretty much takes the discretion away from the judge,” Strine said. But he added that he could have suspended Fleming’s sportsman privileges for considerably longer than he did.

Strine also said he allowed Fleming to make the payments in installments, citing the accidental nature of the crime.

RELYING ON information from a story in the Sanders County Ledger, a Daily Inter Lake news brief in last Monday’s “Regional Roundup” referred to Fleming as “poacher,” which he said compounded his poor luck by tarnishing his reputation in his home town.

“Poaching” is not legally defined under Montana law, and is instead a more generalized term. Fish, Wildlife and Parks game warden Capt. Lee Anderson said he typically reserves the word for those who illegally kill wildlife with intent.

“I generally only use the term for folks that do it purposefully and knowingly,” Anderson said. “... We try to work with guys as much as we can, and then it’s up to the judge to decide what kind of penalty he wants to levy.”

Ultimately, Strine said the responsibility rests with Fleming, regardless of whether the circumstances were unfortunate.

“If you’re gonna go out in the woods with a rifle, you better know the law and what you’re going to shoot at, and what you’re not going to shoot at,” Strine said.

While Fleming disagreed with the charges, he said he appreciated the warden’s credulity after Borden called in the incident. Still, he feels that a judge should have some leeway when sentencing someone who had no intention to break the law.

“As a hunter, there should be an incentive for every hunter to do the right thing and the honest thing, which is to report yourself,” he said. “They shouldn’t throw the book at an honest hunter. I’ve never had a hunting violation in my life and I’ve never had a criminal history.”



Rich Landers
Rich Landers joined The Spokesman-Review in 1977. He is the Outdoors editor for the Sports Department writing and photographing stories about hiking, hunting, fishing, boating, conservation, nature and wildlife and related topics.

Follow Rich online:




Go to the full Outdoors page