ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

Don Adair's Seat Time

Lexus IS proves itself under pressure

Hats off to Lexus. They turned us loose in the new IS sedan on an autocross course yesterday — and supplied a batch of competitors’ cars for comparison. 

From the Lexus family, we drove the IS 250 ($35,950), IS 350 ($39,465) and IS 350 F Sport AWD ($45,320). 

The competitive set included the M-B C350 ($37,850), Audi A4 2.0T ($32,500) and BMW 335i ($43,295).
 
This wasn’t a true apples-to-apples comparo. Each car has its own, unique strengths and various weaknesses. Some are better suited to track work than others; some are better all-around performers. Forced to use any of them as a daily driver, I’d be a happy fellow.
 
Based on two laps around a narrow, tight autocross course, I came away feeling that Lexus still has work to do if it hopes to dethrone BMW from the top sport-sedan spot. Judging solely by the seat of the pants, without the benefit of a timer, the Bimmer’s responses felt sharper than the competitions’. It seemed to be the quickest off the line, made quicker shifts than the rest and exhibited the razor-sharp turn-in for which its 3 Series sedans are famous.
 
In terms of pure acceleration, the Audi was the slowest of the bunch, but danced nimbly around the cones in the tight sections. Despite a startling front-end lightness during hard braking, the Benz was stable and responsive and exhibited excellent throttle response. 
 
The IS family felt like the largest car of the group but was surprisingly quick through even the tightest sections of the course. Both 250 and 350 RWD trims felt lively and crisp throughout the course, but my driving partner and I both felt the AWD 350 F Sport
had throttle-lag issues, which can be death in an autocross course where one needs instant responses.
 
BTW, did I mention we were instructed to “take it easy” in this demonstration, that our purpose was merely to compare how the cars stacked up in terms of the demands of daily driving. 
 
Ha! Setting out cones and telling journos to “take it easy” is like telling kindergartners to not eat paste.
 
Lexus knew what it was doing all along, of course. They knew the hotdogs would favor the Bimmer on an autocross course. They also knew that we’d be able to take the long view; the new IS is a very well-rounded car that can hold its own on a competitor’s turf while excelling at those things most drivers value.
 
To wit, the IS is a far better car than the one it replaces. Better looking, more comfortable, more responsive.
 
Its seats were the best of the bunch we tested, its cabin as elegant and ergonomically sound as any. Rear-seat accommodations are very good and overall fit and finish is superb, even on these preproduction cars. 
 
And then there’s that legendary Lexus build quality. I’ve never been much of a Lexus fan but the company’s beginning to make a believer of me.
 
The IS goes on sale this summer. It’s worth the wait.

Lexus throws down the gauntlet with new IS

Lexus throws down the gauntlet today. We’re in San Francisco for the introduction of the third-generation 2014 IS, which is meant to do battle with BMW’s mighty 3 Series. Though it won’t be in showrooms until summer, Lexus hopes to gin up interest early by giving journalists a sneak peak.

It’s an interesting strategy for a company that traditionally plays its cards close to the vest. Even more startling, Lexus will turn us loose on an autocross course this morning, giving us a chance to evaluate the IS under the kinds of conditions enthusiasts care about.
 
Like SUV owners who never drive off-road, sport sedan owners are not likely to put their cars to the test but like knowing they could. 
 
As before, there are two IS iterations, the 204-hp IS 250 and the 306-hp IS 350. Both trims will be available in rear- and all-wheel-drive.
 
Of particular interest today will be the IS 350 F Sport trim. Its uniquely tuned adaptive suspension includes normal, sport and sport-plus modes, allowing the driver to extract maximum performance from a chassis that has been significantly stiffened. 
 
The IS 250, will have a starting MSRP of $35,950 for RWD and $38,485 for AWD. The IS 350 will have a starting MSRP of $39,465 for RWD and $41,700 for AWD.  
 
Lexus says the base price for the 2014 IS 350 is 2.1 percent lower than the model it replaces, and that the differential between the 250 and 350 iterations is reduced by 33 percent.
 
I’ll have more to say about the new IS after today’s ride-and-drive and will post an update in the next day or two.

Kia Optima: The most beautiful family sedan?

Is it possible that Kia has created the best-looking family sedan on the market?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, of course, and all the main contenders have stepped up their games lately (think Fusion, Camry, Accord), so I don’t know that I’m prepared to go out on that limb.

But still.

The possibility occurred to me Monday. Dusk had morphed into full-on dark and my Titanium Silver tester waited for me in the halogen glow of a nearly empty parking lot.

In that light, and with a clear view of the car’s flanks, its crisp clean lines and ideal proportions cohered in a way that belied its modest roots. Quite elegant. Shouldn’t be a surprise, I suppose, since Kia’s lead designer is a fellow named Peter Schreyer*. Schreyer designed for VW/Audi until Kia stole him away.

I do have reservations about the Optima; I find the front fascia/grille underwhelming. In that regard, I much prefer Schreyer's work with Audi. Otherwise, the thing is a home run.

Photos don’t do the Optima justice. Check it out next time you see one sitting by its lonesome in a grocery store parking lot. At dusk. Bathed in a halogen glow.

*Postscript: When I Googled Schreyer to make sure I'd spelled his name correctly, I learned he'd been named president of Kia in December. Two weeks later, it was announced he'd take over lead designer chores for both Kia and its parent company, Hyundai.

2014 Acura MDX: SH-AWD still on the job

In my previous post, I promised the lowdown on the 2014 Acura MDX, which should start arriving in dealerships by summer.

As you may recall, I’d come across a rumor that Acura would dropSuper Handling All-Wheel-Drive (SH-AWD) from upcoming versions of the MDX. PR boss Chuck Shifsky was quick to respond to my query to that  effect.

“Bad rumor,” he said.

Acura show the new MDX at the Detroit Auto Show today and, in fact, SH-AWD is still onboard. 

The only real change, traction-wise, is that for the first time the MDX will be available in a front-wheel-drive format. This comes in response to requests from Sun Belt dealers.

Otherwise, the ’14 MDX gets a full facelift. Its new “Aero Sculpture” styling not only looks good but also improves aerodynamic efficiency by up to 16 percent.

It will be shorter by 1.5 inches and ride on a longer wheelbase, which should enhance ride quality and boost cabin and cargo space. A new chassis is lighter and more rigid and new front and rear suspension designs are expected to produce in a sportier ride-and-handling package.

There’s a new engine, a 3.5-liter V-6 that’s expected to produce more torque while improving fuel efficiency to class-leading levels.

Acura will load the MDX with a host of safety technologies and expect to see the next generation of Acura’s cloud-based AcuraLink connectivity initiative.

Acura aims to make me happy

I’m never going to own a large crossover — i.e., one with three rows — but if I did, it would be Acura’s MDX.

The MDX rides well, though it’s not the least bit sporty. It’s strong and handsome, though not at all flashy. It’s comfortable and quiet, though a bit old-school in certain ways.

To wit: Unless I’m misreading the spec sheet, that spiffy, new 2013 MDX you’re eyeing isn’t available with such a commonplace feature as keyless entry and ignition.

This isn’t a huge surprise. Acura is Honda’s up-market division and Honda’s strong suit is engineering. They’re less interested in key-fob transponders than in the greasy bits down below. When they do engage ones and zeros, it's generally in an effort to tackle a pressing need, not whether I can open the car without taking the keys out of my pocket.

Many buyers value Honda's go-slow approach — it tends to reduce failures and increase resale value, though I’m certain it costs the company sales.

There is one piece of Acura tech I’m particularly fond of. Its Super Handling All-Wheel-Drive (SH-AWD) system — is simply the best of the breed. I've never driven a more surefooted car in the snow.

A new, 2014 MDX is coming in 2013 and there are rumors afloat that Acura will drop SH-AWD for a lesser system, presumably in an effort to reduce the price of the MDX.

I’m not a prospective owner, so my vote doesn’t count for much. Still, I look forward to my annual winter test, simply because it’s so much fun to drive a capable rig in ugly conditions. Plus, largely because of SH-AWD It’s a car I never hesitate to recommend.

Let's just say I have an interest.

Today, I reached out to Chuck Shifsky in Acura’s PR office, asking for the official line on the SH-AWD question.

“Bad rumor,” he wrote. “We’ll share more on 14 MDX next week in Detroit.”

I won’t be at the Detroit Auto Show next week, but I’ll look forward to getting the lowdown — and when there’s more to tell, I’ll pass it along.

Honda Accord Sport: New trim scores big

Today, I give up my 2013 Honda Accord Sport sedan. In its place, I’ll get an Acura MDX, so life isn’t all bad. Still, I’ll miss the Accord.

The ’13 is the first iteration of the 9th-generation Accord, long one of America’s favorite midsize sedans. It’s a bit smaller and lighter this year, but has a roomier interior and larger trunk.

No one buys an Accord for glam or racetrack cred. It’s your basic car. But basic doesn’t have to be boring. Even equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), my tester was nimble, responsive and light on its feet. The electrically assisted steering system felt natural and had a pleasing heft. The suspension, firm enough to limit body lean during turns, was also sufficiently compliant to laugh off our pocked city streets.

The Sport is a new trim level this year and, other than puzzling packaging choices, I’m impressed. The price is right — $24,180 with the standard 6-speed transmission; $24,980, with the CVT — and the features set makes sense.

The base Accord ($23,270/23,780) is equipped with dual-zone automatic climate control, full power accessories, cruise control, an 8-inch video display, Bluetooth (phone and audio), a rearview camera, cruise control, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, a height-adjustable manual driver seat, a folding rear seat and a four-speaker sound system with a CD player, an auxiliary audio jack, iPod/USB audio interface and Pandora functionality.

One step up from the base, the Sport gets a bit more power from the standard 2.4-liter four (189 hp vs. 185), 18-inch wheels, rear spoiler, eight-way power driver seat with power lumbar, leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift paddles for the CVT.

This is one of the better CVTs I’ve driven — its pseudo shifts are clean and sharp and Honda has dialed out all but a hint of the CVT’s traditional rubber-band responses — but I’d take the stick anyway. Fuel efficiency is a hair better with the CVT but I prefer the superior engagement a stick makes possible.

Here’s what puzzles me about the Sport: a host of desirable options — heated seats, up-level audio system, navigation, etc. — are not available. To qualify for those and other options, buyers must move up to the EX-L trim ($28,785).

There’s more to say, most of which I already said back in October.

Mazda: Taking the hard road back

In a typical year, Mazda sells fewer total vehicles in the U.S. than Toyota sells Camrys, or Honda sells Accords. Or Civics, for that matter.

In 2010, in the heart of the Great Recession, Ford and Mazda unwound their longtime partnership, casting a shadow of the brand's future here. Still, in 2011, Mazda introduced a new efficiency initiative called Skyactiv, which it implemented partially on the 2012 Mazda3 compact and then fully on the CX-5 crossover. 
 
Skyactiv doesn't re-engineer the internal combustion engine as much as refines it. Piece by piece, system by system, Mazda engineers seek out inefficiencies to resolve. Weight and friction are the two biggies and receive a lion's share of the attention.
 
In the end, both cars achieve high levels of efficiency and neither compromises Mazda's focus on performance. 
 
2013 Mazda3 interiorNow, the end-of-year sales numbers are in and the company's future looks brighter than it has in a good long time.
 
Total sales were 277,046, Mazda's best since 2007 and second-best since 1994.
 
The 3 sold 123,361 units, of which 69 percent were Skyactiv models.
 
At 43,319 units, the CX-5 was Mazda's second-best-selling vehicle and is a finalist in the North American Truck/Utility of the Year competition, the winner of which will be announced Jan. 14.
 
I recently spent a week testing a Mazda3 sedan (it's also available as a hatch), and once again was taken both with its lively, responsive attitude and its 28/40 fuel efficiency ratings. I reviewed the original Skyactiv 3 this time last year and I'm not sure I'll do a full review this time around.
 
However, if you're shopping in the compact segment, it deserves a serious look.

Too many miles; too few words

I’ve been driving lots but not writing; here's a quick and dirty update:

dashboard stitching, 2013 GMC Terrain Denali

The GMC Terrain Denali aspires for near-luxury quality in the compact crossover category and largely succeeds. Inattention to important details undermines the effort, though. Hint: If you’re going to indulge in stitched dashboards, sew straight or don’t sew.

Hyundai Elantra Coupe

2013 Hyundai Elantra Coupe

I left the Terrain at the Spokane airport and on the other end - the Newark, New Jersey, airport - picked up a Hyundai Elantra Coupe. The coupe, which is new to the Elantra lineup, performed valiantly over 10 days of high-speed New Jersey Turnpike warfare. It 1.8-liter four makes 148 hp, which is plenty, though the optional six-speed automatic is geared for economy and the quick downshifts required by the parry-and-thrust of freeway driving weren’t in the cards.

“Maple-syrup shifts,” my notes read.

Sidebar: New Jersey drivers are fast but also polite and predictable. They understand the art of the merge, get it that letting the other guy into your lane is not a sign of weakness and stay out of the far left lane except when passing.

2013 Mazda3

2013 Mazda3

On Christmas Eve, we were met at the Seattle airport by a 2013 Mazda3 sedan. Smaller even than the Elantra and incredibly efficient (40 mpg highway) the 3 was, as always, a fun drive, lively and responsive. Our tester wore brand-new Goodyear Blizzak winter tires, which earned their keep on a Christmas-night Snoqualmie Pass run. Adaptive Xenon headlights shined up the road like the deck of an aircraft carrier, a complete godsend out on that dark and snow-splotched piece of road.

2013 Honda Accord Sport

2013 Honda Accord Coupe

In October, I wrote admiringly about the ninth-generation, 2013 Honda Accord, a return to form for a car that had lost its edge. Now there’s a new trim, called Sport (from $24,470), which slots into the lineup just above the base LX. On the heels of the short-wheel-base imps I’d been driving, the Accord felt like a grown-ups’ car; quiet, solid and settled on the road. I’ll write more in coming days, but will wrap with the observation that this Accord could reign again as America’s best-selling passenger car.

Subaru Crosstrek: Putting a point on practical

I’ve been distracted by other chores this week, but I’d be remiss if I were to move on without a parting nod to the Subaru Crosstrek.

Truthfully, it’s such an unassuming little car it’s hard to know where to start.

How about this? With its 8.7 inches of ground clearance (up 3 inches from the base Impreza), the Crosstrek is perfect for those days when the snow piles so deep a normal car turns into a snowplow.

It happens often enough around here — especially at higher elevations — that a little extra ground clearance can be a godsend.

Then there are those times when you find yourself wondering what lies down that goat trail marked “Primitive Road.”

With its extra ground clearance and standard all-wheel-drive, the Crosstrek goes places others can’t.

As we’ve already mentioned, fuel efficiency is exceptional (23/30 with the 5-speed manual; 25/33 with the optional CVT) and the price of entry ($22,000-plus) is attractive.

Just don’t expect fancy. Subaru doesn’t do fancy. Subaru does utilitarian, which is the point of the enterprise.

We'll leave it at that. Watch for a full review Dec. 29.

VW Passat: The affordable European

Though European carmakers dominate the upper end of the automotive market, they are largely absent from the segments where most of us shop.

The chief exception is Volkswagen, which of course made its mark flogging the humble Beetle.

2013 Volkswagen Passat interiorVW has flirted with going upscale — most notably with the excellent but short-lived Phaeton sedan — and yes, one may still drop $60 Large on the hybrid version of the Toureg, but the brand’s offerings tend to fall well below $35,000, even when well equipped.

The compact Jetta starts $16,430, including destination, while the 2013 Passat competes in the family sedan segment with a $21,650 base price.

That fetches a Passat that’s 4 inches longer than its predecessor and rides on a wheelbase that’s grown 3 inches. Its cabin is among the roomiest, quietest and most comfortable in the segment.

The front seats are firm and well bolstered and rear-seat legroom rivals that of some full-size cars. Fit-and-finish and materials quality are very good.

The Passat’s touchscreen-based center console is a model of clarity and crisp efficiency. It’s faster, better designed and less distracting than most. Most importantly, it’s flanked by buttons that simplify its operation.

Passat no longer hangs its hat on razor’s-edge handling but its fully independent suspension (front struts, rear multilinks) produces a lively and controlled ride, while tuning out the harsh impacts of potholes and freeway expansion joints.

In the VW tradition, steering is accurate and responsive, though numb on center and a bit heavy at low speeds.

Three engines are available; a 170-horsepower, 2.5-liter five-cylinder; a 140-hp, 2.0-liter turbodiesel that makes 236 pound-feet of torque; and a 280-hp 3.5-liter V-6.

I’ve driven only the six, which is a lovely engine. Quiet and smooth, it possesses a broad power band that VW’s DSG automated manual eagerly exploits.

The base, five-cylinder engine also powers the lighter Jetta, where its output is sufficient. In the heavier Passat, it’s overmatched. For best results it should be paired with the six-speed manual gearbox, not the optional six-speed automatic.

The torque-rich TDI (turbo-diesel) could be the pick of the litter. It’s rated at 31/43 (manual) and 30/40 (DSG) and some testers say real-world numbers are 8-10 mpg better than that.

Herein lies the rub: Take a pass on the 2.5 and soon you’re talking real money. The TDI starts at $26,675 and the six starts at $29,765.

If it’s any consolation — and it should be — the base Passat is equipped with automatic headlights, keyless entry, full power accessories, air-conditioning, a six-way manual driver seat with lumbar adjustment, cloth upholstery, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, redundant steering-wheel audio controls, cruise control, trip computer, Bluetooth with streaming audio and a six-speaker sound system with a CD player and auxiliary audio input.

Word is VW plans to sweeten the package in 2013, replacing the five with a 200-hp, 1.8-liter turbocharged four.

The 2013 Passat is sized, equipped and priced to win the hearts and minds of Americans — and it’s built at a new plant in Chattanooga, Tenn. It’s as clear as it can be: This European wants a piece of the action.

Don Adair is a Spokane-based freelance writer. Contact him at don@dadair.com.

2013 Volkswagen Passat SE w/Sunroof
Vehicle base price: $20,845
Trim level base price: $29,235
Optional equipment: Our SE w/Sunroof tester included no optional equipment.
EPA ratings: 20 city/28 highway
Premium unleaded fuel required

Subaru Crosstrek: Wait! Haven’t we been here before?

“That looks like a fun little car. That’s the kind of car you’d just go out and have fun in.” Uniformed agent of the US gov’t, peering through the coffee shop window at the Subaru XV Crosstrek parked outside.

“That’s the kind of car I’d have bought for myself, but my wife wanted something more comfortable.” Friendly neighborhood barristo

Subaru has done it again. They’ve altered the bones of the compact Impreza, lifted it three inches, bulked up selected suspension bits, added body cladding and created a new model.

Last time it was the Outback; this one they call the XV Crosstrek (from $22,790, including destination). Roomier than the base Impreza — four full-size adults can get comfy — it boasts class-leading fuel efficiency - 23 city/30 highway with the base 5-speed manual; 25/33 with the optional CVT.

Hint: Get the manual. The Crosstrek checks in at a not-svelte 3,100 lbs and the 148-hp flat-four needs all the help it can get.

Subaru XV Crosstrek dash with navigationThe postal carrier was right; the Crosstrek looks spry and engaging, though performance isn’t its strong suit.

The barristo was also right: it’s a bit down on power, but with standard AWD, short wheelbase and elevated stance, it will handle light-duty off-roading. Once again, best to avoid the CVT if trail-running is on your agenda.

He was also right on the comfort score. With Its elevated ride height and truncated wheelbase, the Crosstrek’s ride is choppy on city streets, though not bad on the open road.

The little four labors to get to speed and road and wind noise are present at speed. Something has to give when budgets are involved and the compromise between weight and silence is a perpetual challenge.

So is cabin tech, where Subaru lags. The base trim, ironically dubbed “Premium”) fails to quality for navigation, which would have provided the otherwise dour dash with its only splash of color.

People buy Subie’s for qualities other than flash, though, and this one will doubtless find its market.

Cadillac ATS: Meant to be missed

2013 Cadillac ATS

I felt a twinge of loss when it came time to give up Cadillac ATS tester yesterday.
 
It happens now and again, but only when a car strikes a very specific chord. For me, that chord is all about how the car feels under and around me; how it responds to inputs given it via the steering wheel, pedals and, sometimes, the transmission; how it reacts to the road surface and how much it tells me about what’s going on down there.
 
Does it remain alien — separate from me — or does it welcome me into its world, invite me into its processes?
 
It’s an esoteric standard, I admit, and presents a high bar that few cars try and fewer surpass.
 
Failed attempts litter GM’s history; at one point, it seemed that every car Pontiac built was going to be a BMW-killer.
 
More recently, Cadillac’s CTS came very close to ringing my bell, but the ATS finally did the trick. Its particular combination of chassis dynamics, mechanics and driver orientation triggered all the right synapses.
 
Its optional Magnetic Ride Control System (see yesterday’s post) is a marvelous innovation that seemingly has lain in wait for the ATS. In this 3,300-pound car it finds its highest expression of compliance and responsiveness.
 
Though its benefits are apparent at any speed, they’re most notable when the driver has committed to a hard corner where the pavement is broken or rutted.
 
When pushed, MRC pushes back — through the hands, the feet and the seat of the pants — communicating the action of the electromagnetic dampers as they react to the broken pavement and fight to keep the tires planted. 
 
When one is fully in tune with the car, one can detect the initial soft response — and its instantaneous rush to firmness.  
 
Initially, this sensation of hydraulics at work is a bit strange but the driver quickly comes to appreciate the stability it provides.
 
Trick hydraulics aside, this chassis has been sorted properly. Coming from a German maker — read BMW — it would be praiseworthy; coming from GM, it’s a revelation.
 
There are elements of the ATS of which I’m not as fond. CUE — the voice-activated/touchscreen infotainment system — is overly ambitious and a bit of a muddle and the back seat and trunk are smaller than they should be; but this Cadillac is meant to be missed when it goes away.

Cadillac ATS: Taming the wild road

In 2002, GM debuted a new suspension technology called Magnetic Ride Control (MRC).

That name sounds like it came rolling straight from the Hype Machine, but MRC was a breakthrough in suspension design. It’s behind the FE3 sport suspension that’s available on the ATS.
 
So let’s get geeky.
 
Suspension engineers are challenged with striking a balance between ride compliance — the ability of a suspension to absorb impacts — and the stiffness required to keep the tires firmly planted when the car leans in a fast corner.  
 
MRC solves the problems with a single, ingenuous solution.
 
magnetic ride control shock aborbersThe system employs dampers — a fancy word for shock absorbers — at each corner of the car. Inside each damper is a tube which is filled with a fluid in which iron particles are suspended.
 
A pair of elecromagnetic coils flanks each fluid-filled tube. 
 
When sensors distributed throughout the car detect body roll, they send electrical impulses to the coils.
 
Receiving the impulse stream, the coils switch on, creating a magnetic field that shoots through the fluid and causes the iron bits to line up like trees in an orchard. So aligned, they cause the damper fluid to thicken.
 
The greater the degree of body roll, the greater the degree of alignment. As the fluid thickens, it exerts greater force on the suspension components that steady the wheel.
 
MRC reads the road every millisecond and can change damping in five milliseconds, says Cadillac.

2013 Toyota Avalon: Swinging for the fences

For 2013, Toyota set out not to merely update the full-size Avalon; instead, it gave its underachieving flagship a personality transplant.

For the first 12 years of its existence, the Avalon lacked focus and, consequently, a true identity. It was the Toyota of choice for owners seeking Toyota reliability and Lexus comforts but who, for whatever reason, preferred not to move up to Lexus.
 
The new Avalon erases that past. Shunning its Lexus-lite ID, it has become a car that’s meant to be driven and not merely piloted. 
 
Sharp reflexes replace previous vagaries. Handling is crisp, steering is quick and accurate. The ride is firm — while remaining supple and compliant — and unwanted body motions are eased into retirement. 
 
Speaking of which, Toyota aims the new Avalon at a younger set of buyers. Today’s average buyer is 65; Toyota is shooting for 55. 
 
To this purpose, designers re-skinned the Avalon. Exterior dimensions are tighter and styling is crisper and more dynamic. A strong, lifting shoulder line flows from the front fender to the short decklid, where it meets up with a tapering roofline.
 
Toyota is especially proud of the front fascia, where a whisper-thin grille floats above a protuberant and oversized lower air intake. The look may not be entirely cohesive but at least we can no longer accuse Toyota of not trying.
 
In the transition from boulevard cruiser to something more engaging, the Avalon has lost 160 pounds and gained stiffness; chassis rigidity is up 16 percent, reducing body flex and allowing suspension engineers to strike a balance between ride firmness and compliance.
 
Toyota has spared little expense to elevate the Avalon’s cabin to the highest standards of the near-luxury class — and, perhaps, beyond. Hand-stitched leather (available in two grades) covers the seats, while a soft-touch, hand-stitched material wraps the sculpted, bi-level dash. Smoked-chrome accents and glossy panel pieces add subtle flash. 
 
A variable-rate window motor powers the windows, slowing them near the top of their travel to reduce wind noise and, says Toyota, “add refinement.”
 
Despite its trimmer dimensions, Avalon’s interior and trunk have grown more spacious. There is, of course, almost no end to available cabin technology.
 
Two powertrains are available, a conventional V-6, and a hybrid.
 
A 268-horsepower, 3.5-liter V-6, paired with a three-mode six-speed automatic, powers conventional models. Tuned for efficiency, the gearbox delivers smooth, no-rush shifts that always land the engine in the heart of its power band. In Sport mode, the gearbox matches engine revs on downshifts, an unexpected bit of sport geekery. Toyota claims sub-7-second Zero-to-60 times and a best-in-class efficiency ratings of 21 mpg city/31 mpg highway. 
 
Running the latest version of Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive system, the Avalon Hybrid produces a seamless hybrid experience, while delivering 39 mpg city/40 mpg highway.
 
More good news: Avalon’s base price ($31,750, including destination) drops $1,445. Hybrids, which are available in premium trims only, start at $36,315.
 
Under new CEO Akido Toyoda, Toyota and Lexus are redefining themselves. “Toyota’s back and we’re going to be swinging for the fences again,” one exec said at the Avalon launch.
 
Welcome back.
 
2013 Toyota Avalon
Various conventional and hybrid models reviewed
Price range: $31,750-42,160
V-6 fuel efficiency: 21 city/31 highway
Hybrid fuel efficiency: 40 city/39 highway
Regular unleaded fuel specified

Cadillac ATS: New kid has attitude

It's all-GM all-the-time this week here at Seat Time.

For the past few days, we've focused on Chevy's new mini-car, the Spark. For the next few days we'll look at Cadillac's newest and smallest, the ATS sport sedan.

We might as well get this out of the way right up top; Cadillac makes no bones of the fact that it benchmarked BMW's 3 Series during ATS development. And why not? The 3 is the world's compact sport sedan of choice; if you're going to pick a target, make it a good one.

The ATS is a four-passenger sedan available in RWD and AWD configurations. It offers a choice of three powerplants - two fours (one turbocharged) and a six - and a wide range of performance enhancements and options.

By its very nature, it's a temptress, beckoning one to places one should not venture — and making sure you love every moment of it.

But more about performance in a later post. For now, we'll say only that the ATS's talents outstrip those of any Caddy before it, save its big brother, the 556-hp CTS-V. Suffice to say, its capabilities also will surpass those possessed by all but a very exclusive handful of drivers.

It's a good one, but so is the 3 Series. We have a shoot-out on our hands, folks.

Before signing off, we'll note that the ATS:

  • is less rougly $2,000 less expensive than the 3, when comparably equipped, says Cadillac;
  • features Cadlillac's new CUE (Cadillac User Experience), an voice-activated touchscreen infotainment system that pairs as many as 10 Bluetooth-enabled mobile devices, USBs, SD cards and MP3 players. You may not love it, but you'll learn to make your peace with it.

Check in tomorrow for a more detailed look at the systems that make the littlest Caddy go.

Chevy Spark: Making more from less

As you would imagine, the base Spark ($12,995, including destination) is relatively spare in the standard-features category. Air-conditioning, power windows, 60/40-split-folding rear seats, a height-adjustable driver seat, a tilt-only steering wheel, a trip computer, OnStar telematics and a four-speaker radio with an auxiliary audio jack are all standard, as are 15-inch alloys.

But whichever Spark you choose, the gauges perch behind the steering wheel in a column-mounted pod, a nod to motorcycle design. There’s an analog speedo, a digital tach and a small driver-information display.

All rather basic and functional.

Body-colored trim bits brighten the interior and rescue it from tedium. Ice-blue ambient lighting comes up gently when a door opens.

The steering wheel tilts but doesn’t telescope, which may bring grief to long-legged drivers. Larger folk are likely to find the cabin too cozy.

Predictably, there are minimal storage opportunities, though a small bin beneath the center stack accommodates a cell phone, which otherwise would find its way into a cupholder. 

One sits on the smallish, slightly bolstered seats, rather than nestling into them. Despite any obvious lumber support, my back survived pain-free, despite logging several serial hours of drive time.

There’s adequate rear-seat legroom for adults, though the bottom cushions are thin and sit low to the floor. No guarantees from here regarding their comfort on longer jaunts.

As I learned the hard way, folding the rear seats to increase cargo space reduces front-seat legroom. 

Chevy's interior designers made a valiant effort to maximize the available space. Fact is, there wasn’t that much to work with.

No such thing as a bump-free revolution

I suspect that in the final analysis, touchscreen navigation and infotainment systems will be found to be dangerous.

IMHO, any onboard function that requires that drivers a) take their eyes off the road and b) reach out to touch an icon on a screen while moving is inherently unsafe. Despite the learning curve involved, I prefer device-based input systems like those pioneered by Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Audi.
 
Of them, I like Audi’s MMI system best.
 
Strike one: Chevy bases its new MyLink radio infotainment system on touchscreen technology. 
 
Strike two: The system is unstable. MyLink froze four times in four days and refused to respond; even shutting off and restarting the Spark failed to do the trick. I learned to simply wait it out.  
 
Under normal circumstances, this is an annoying glitch. If it were to happen while navigating heavy — and fast — traffic in the urban areas for which the Spark is intended, the consequences could be significant.
 
Strike three: I’ve decided to not levy a strike three, though I’m tempted. The value of smartphone-based systems depends largely on having a functional smartphone with a reliable signal. No signal, no Bluetooth streaming audio, no BringGo navigation, no Pandora Internet radio.
 
Chances are that in those places where cell phone coverage fails, satellite radio will fail as well. Whether lost in the wilds of southern Oregon or buried deep the canyons of Manhattan, where there’s no connectivity, there will be no fun.
 
To be fair, owners will learn to bring along a cable for direct phone-to-system connectivity. At least there will be tunes.
 
Also, as systems mature and voice recognition improves, we'll rely on voice commands to control our car's various functions. 
 
Still, as automakers increase our dependency on cloud-based services, we'll have to learn to fend for ourselves.
 
Like all revolutions, this one comes with bumpy spots.

The mighty mini Spark hits the highway

Not even Chevy claims for the Spark the ride and handling package of a German Grand Touring machine.

Twelve feet long and riding on a 93-inch wheelbase, the Spark has more in common size-wise with a washing machine packing crate than an S-class Mercedes.

Fifteen-inch low-rolling-resistance tires paired with a ping-pong-ball-like curb weight of 2,237 pounds promise a third-world ride-and-handling package.

A 84-horsepower, 1.2-liter engine makes the thing go. It can be mated with a five-speed manual or optional four-speed automatic.

Aside from abundant cabin noise at highway speeds, the Spark acquitted itself well on my thanksgiving-week wanderings, which were not paltry.

Despite an absence of steering feel, the Spark tracks well on the freeway and handles abrupt lane changes with the poise of a larger car. During the nearly three-hour jaunt between Portland and Eugene, I lost track of the fact that I was driving a car the size of a walnut with a glandular disorder.

At 70 mph, the little engine happily revved along at something just over 3,000 RPM, but was smooth and silent at those speeds. The onboard fuel meter consistently read just in excess of 37 mph.

On the winding two-lane Hwy. 38 between Drain, Oregon, and the coast, the Spark carved through curves with minimal body lean and, when I needed to, I could drop a gear or two and get around slower traffic.

Upcoming: Tomorrow, we’ll look at smartphone-base infotainment systems. Further ahead, cabin comfort and amenities.

Chevy Spark: Mighty mite or 2200-lb weakling?

Chevrolet’s Spark is the company’s first mini-car, a competitor to the Fiat 500, Smart Fortwo and Scion IQ.

The anti-Suburban, if you will.

It’s GM’s smallest car, and also, at $12,995, its most affordable.

Yet the Spark has room for four adults and, so configured, enough cargo space for a handful of grocery bags, a gym bag or a couple of overnightbags. Dropping the rear seatbacks trebles cargo space to 31.5 cubic feet, or a little more than a third of the Suburban’s.

A mere 12 feet long, the Spark rides on a 93.5-inch wheelbase and weighs in at 2,237 lbs with its standard five-speed manual transmission and 2,269 with the optional four-speed automatic.

EPA ratings: 32 city/38 highway, on regular unleaded.

In the spirit of austerity — and weight savings — the Spark does without a CD player (true fact: an in-dash CD player can weigh 7 lbs). Instead, a smartphone-based system called MyLink Radio serves as the entertainment center via Bluetooth, cable or USB.

Instead of a navigation system, Chevy will introduce a new $50 app called BringGo. For now, owners must rely on the optional OnStar Directions & Connections package that, after three trial months, requires a $28.50 monthly subscription charge. 

Chevy pegs the Spark as a city car for young, first-time buyers. But there's no reason that older folks, with downsized lifestyles, won't also take a look, especially RVers looking for an affordable toad. 

Coming up: We’ll take a deeper look at ride quality, cabin noise and the like, and give some thought to smartphone entertainment systems.

2013 Escape: More Than Just Cool Stuff

So much cool stuff clings to the 2013 Ford Escape, it would be easy to lose site of how fundamentally good it is.

No doubt you’ve heard about the motion-sensing handsfree tailgate, the torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system and the first-in-class application of active park assist.

Nor will Ford let you forget about the three engine choices, two of which are turbo-charged and direct-injected, or the Escape’s dramatic fuel efficiency gains.
 
Also a new are a blind-spot warning system, a cross-traffic alert system and a system that slows an Escape carrying too much speed into a corner.
 
Be that as it may, I recently crossed the state twice in a minimally equipped, FWD Escape and came away with an appreciation for the basic car, sans frills. In town, the ride is firm but compliant; on the road it’s settled and stable, the result of a longer wheelbase, wider track and new steering and suspension systems.
 
A trim, contemporary exterior replaces the boxy shape of the previous generation and the stylish cabin is finished in high-quality materials.
 
The Sync connectivity system remains one of the best in the business and, while it remains a work in progress, the optional MyFord Touch system is no longer a reason to not buy the car.
 
Fulfills the world-car promise
The Escape makes good on the promise of the world-car. Known in Europe and China as the Kuga, it’s based on the all-new and very good Focus. In a single vehicle, Ford marries the size, efficiency and dynamics demanded by foreign markets with the comforts and technologies sought by Americans.
 
The Escape has been redesigned from the outside in. The roofline comes down about 4.5 inches and ground clearance drops half an inch. The streamlining process results in a bit less passenger space and a bit more cargo space.
 
The base, FWD-only Escape S ($23,750, with destination) is lightly equipped and intended primarily for fleets. Most consumers will choose the SE ($25,895) or SEL ($28,695). The top-of-the-line Titanium rings out at $31,195.
 
A 168-horsepower, 2.5-liter four powers the S. Both SE and SEL can be had with a 178-horsepower 1.6-liter four or a 270-hp, 2.0-liter four. Both are turbocharged and direct-injected.
 
The 2.5 fetches 22 mpg city/31 mpg highway, the 1.6 23 city/33 highway and the 2.0 22/30/25. AWD versions rate 1-2 mpg less.
 
My FWD SE tester had the 1.6-liter Ecoboost engine, which handled Snoqualmie without fuss, though the Ryegrass grade forced a few downshifts. Owners planning to tow or carry heavy loads may need the larger engine.
 
MyFord Touch is still too complex; the touchscreen interface is distracting and the learning curve is steep. Its voice-command lexicon has grown, though, and the system moves us toward the day when we will speak to our cars.
 
Beneath the razzle-dazzle, the 2013 Escape is a seriously good compact CUV, the kind of rig that makes it easy to root for Detroit. 
 
Don Adair is a Spokane-based freelance writer. He may be contacted at don@dadair.com.
 
2013 Ford Escape SE FWD

Vehicle base price: $22,470

Trim level base price: $25,070
As tested: $27,860
Optional equipment: Cargo management package; roof rails with cross bars; tonneau cover; perimeter alarm, MyFord Touch with satellite radio and navigation.
EPA ratings: 23 city/33 highway

Regular unleaded fuel specified

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Reviews and commentary about autos.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Don Adair's Seat Time.

Contributors

Don Adair

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here