ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

The Slice

“One of the lamest columns…”

A thoughtful reader left an online comment the other day in which he or she referred to The Slice as “One of the lamest columns in any paper across the country.”

It's always nice to have one's hard work recognized.

But I have questions.

How much time would one have to spend surveying the nation's newspapers before making such a claim in an even remotely credible way?

Let's say you chose to follow just one columnist at every paper in the country. Wouldn't that take a great deal of effort? I mean, there are a lot of papers out there. But I don't know my critic personally — he or she goes by a delightful make-believe name. So perhaps he or she does, in fact, have the time to conduct such media monitoring.

More power to 'em.

But here's my real issue. Why is The Slice just “one of” the lamest and not “THE” lamest?

Who are my rivals for this honor? I'd like to check out the competition.  


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to The Slice

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Features writer Paul Turner is a columnist for The Spokesman-Review in the Features department. He writes "The Slice" column, which appears six times a week and produces general features stories for the Today section.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on The Slice.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here