ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

Spin Control

State getting bad rap on military voting waiver

Have you heard about how lunkheads in Washington state are trying to take the most precious right of all away from our brave men and women dodging bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan? And how those commie pinkos in the federal government are going to let them because it will help Democrats win some tight races in November?
Or something like that. It gets better – or, worse – with each retelling of the reports that Washington state received a waiver from the federal law requiring military and overseas voters to be sent their ballots a month and a half before an election.
If it’s making your blood boil, congratulate yourself on your concern for military personnel. And take a chill pill, as the kids would say.
We’ll explain why, inside the blog….


True fact: Washington has one of the highest number of military personnel stationed inside its borders. From the Everett home port to Joint Base Lewis McCord to Fairchild Air Force Base, the state has thousands of men and women in harm’s way at any given moment.
True fact: Washington state applied for, and received, a waiver to the federal Military and Overseas Voter Act requiring states to mail out ballots to deployed troops and other out-of-country voters 45 days before an election, to help ensure the ballot has a reasonable chance to reach them at some mountain outpost in Afghanistan or some ship in the Indian Ocean, give them time to mark it and send it back. The state doesn’t have to send out it’s ballots until Oct. 1.
Generally accepted theory: Military voters tend to be conservative young males, so ballots that come in from troops overseas are more likely to be marked for Republican candidates than Democrats.
Working hypothesis: Washington state could have a really tight U.S. Senate race between Democrat Patty Murray and Republican Dino Rossi.
But one should not string those two facts, the theory and the hypothesis together and conclude there’s a conspiracy afoot to sway the Murray-Rossi race, or the election in general. In truth, Washington got the waiver because it allows military voters more than 45 days to receive their ballots, get them marked, returned and counted.
There’s a quirk about Washington elections laws not understood by many people outside the state – including, apparently, FOX News which had a series of critical stories about Washington and nine other states seeking waivers last Friday. The quirk is that unlike most states, ballots don’t have to be received in Washington on election day, merely sent by that day. They have another 21 days to get to the appropriate elections office, be opened, counted and added to the final tally. And unlike ballots from stateside voters, a military ballot need not even be postmarked by election day, merely signed and dated – a recognition that military mail might not carry a discernable postmark until it reaches the U.S. of A.
Even if some ballots aren’t mailed until Oct. 1 – a worst-case scenario for finishing the count for the Aug. 17 primary, handling any recounts, certifying everything and printing general election ballots with the correct names on them – deployed military voters will have 51 days to cast ballots. That’s six days more than required by federal law. Military voters can also vote by FAX and by e-mail in many counties.
Which is why the Defense Department granted the waiver to Washington: It meets or exceeds federal standards when all things are considered.
The state has a record of doing things to boost participation by military voters. One reason we now vote in mid-August rather than mid-September is to add a month to send out overseas ballots. Before the National Guard’s 81st Combat Brigade deployed to Iraq in 2008, the Secretary of State’s office sent a team to the training center in Yakima to sign soldiers up for their ballots while they were in Iraq.
Among that team was state elections office attorney Katie Blinn, who tried – mostly in vain – to explain the peculiarities of Washington’s election system to FOX News’ Megyn Kelly last Friday on a segment “Willing to serve. Able to vote?”
The state elections office got about 50 irate calls on Friday. Over the weekend, the state Republican Party’s Executive and Central committees passed a unanimous resolution calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to withdraw the waiver request. “Failure to comply with this federal law will almost certainly result in disenfranchising the votes of our brave men and women serving in the military, who risk their lives protecting the voting rights of all Americans.”
At least the state GOP leaders didn’t accuse Reed of trying to throw the election for Murray. Probably because most of committee members knew Reed is a Republican.
Tuesday afternoon, Reed said he hadn’t received the resolution yet, but he had heard about it: “It’s a shame they didn’t talke to me, one of their two statewide elected officials, first. We knock just knock ourselves out for military voters, and they did that (resolution) based on a news report.”


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Nick Deshais covers Spokane City Hall for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here