Advertise Here

Spin Control

I-960 hearing: is it unconstitutional?

OLYMPIA — The chairwoman of the Senate Ways and Means Committee called Initiative 960 “clearly unconstitutional,” but a Republican member of the panel strongly disagreed.

“It’s clearly unconstitutional,” Sen. Margarita Prentice said after another witness argued against any changes in a law passed by voters. “The Supreme Court was given an opportunity (to say so) and it punted.”

That prompted a retort from Sen. Cheryl Pflug: “If our Supreme Court didn’t declare it unconstitutional, it’s not. It’s inappropriate for a member of this body to say we know better.”

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Nick Deshais covers Spokane City Hall for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
Advertise Here