Advertise Here

Spin Control

Special Session Day 3: Early release a bad idea, prison officials say

OLYMPIA – A legislative proposal to release some inmates a few months early as a budget-saving measure is a bad idea, prison officials warned Thursday.
The state already ordered early release for many non-violent, low-risk inmates in previous years as a way to help balance other budgets. Those still behind bars are some of the highest risk prisoners who were convicted of violent or sexual crimes, suffer from mental illness or have a high possibility of committing new crimes, Corrections Director Eldon Vail said.
To read the rest of this post, click here to go inside the blog.

“This is not a population we should let out of prison…until we absolutely must let them out,” Vail told the Senate Ways and Means Committee.
As part of a bill needed to implement proposed budget cuts, the Corrections Department could be ordered to release inmates who have less than a year left on their maximum sentence if they have already passed an early release date earned for good behavior and other benchmarks. Under the Senate proposal, releasing those prisoners could save the state an estimated $15 million in the next two years.
Donald Feist, a community corrections officer from Tacoma, said previous releases of non-violent prisoners have whittled the prison population to “the worst of the worst” and letting the remaining prisoners out any sooner than absolutely necessary was irresponsible and dangerous: “We’re now to the point of jeopardizing our neighbors and our loved ones.
But the proposal only targets inmates who are going to be let out soon, anyway, Sen. Joe Zarelli, R-Ridgefield, said. Even if they serve a full sentence, they’d get out in a few months when the state can no longer legally hold them.
 “We still have the same problem with the individual. Are we better off dealing with the early release and wrapping some kind of services around them” once they are in a community, Zarelli said.
Sen. Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, said the Senate’s budget relies less on savings from early releases of prisoners than the House proposal, and the amount could drop even more. But it’s not likely to drop to zero.
 “We will have to come up with some kinds of reductions,” she said. “We are struggling to come up with a policy…in the most safety conscious way.”

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Nick Deshais covers Spokane City Hall for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
Advertise Here