ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

Spin Control

Sunday Spin: Medical marijuana laws growing hodge podge

OLYMPIA – Whether she realized it or not last spring when wielding her “partial veto” pen, Gov. Chris Gregoire has prompted a hodge podge of pot laws around the state and a fair amount of confusion among the cities.

In Seattle, where possession of a small amount of marijuana is less likely to bring public condemnation than drinking mediocre coffee, medical marijuana dispensaries are being told to register as businesses, pay their taxes, meet building codes and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. But be advised: No smoking laws apply to smoking medical marijuana, too.

In Spokane, dispensaries are being raided by federal agents. There is a city ballot initiative supporting medical marijuana on file with the City Clerk, although sponsors managed to miss all deadlines for making this year’s ballot.

In Ellensburg, people who want medical marijuana are told to get a permit, grow it in an indoor collective garden that can’t be observed from public places and not within 300 feet of schools and other “youth oriented facilities.”

Castle Rock and Shoreline have some temporary rules for collective gardens while Issaquah, Kent, Kirkland, Maple Valley, Snohomish and Tukwila have temporary moratoria on such operations. Pullman might go the moratorium route this week….
  


STacoma has a moratorium on marijuana dispensaries, but city officials reportedly have no plans to shut down the marijuana dispensaries they already have, let alone stop any new ones that might decide to open.
Gregoire is not solely responsible for this, of course. She got a bill from the Legislature that had already been trashed by a pair of U.S. attorneys and had state employees’ unions worried about the prospect of inspecting Cheech and Chong’s back 40.
Part of the problem is a disconnect between the federal government, which officially has a Reefer Madness stance, while voters in states like Washington put marijuana somewhere between a reliable home remedy and a wonder drug.
Advocates of the curative powers of the plant would prefer that everyone call it cannabis, by the way. But of the 100 or so words I heard used for marijuana while growing up, cannabis wasn’t one of them.
The request brings to mind an old Harry Truman joke about him telling his daughter the vegetables looked so good because he spread manure on them. When she suggested he say fertilizer, because it was more refined, Mrs. Truman said: “Hush Margaret. Don’t you know how long it took to get him to say manure?”
If voters say sick people should have medical marijuana, and the federal government says the standard place where sick people get medicine, a pharmacy, can’t dispense it, then someone else will. In Western Washington, dispensaries don’t just advertise in the alternative weekly papers but in the daily press.
The new law – what’s left of it, anyway, after Gregoire’s veto pen did a John Belushi Samurai Warrior number on it – doesn’t countenance dispensaries. It continues to allow for collective gardens, where as many as 10 people can have as many as 45 marijuana plants. But it gives cities the authority to restrict where these gardens can be. Or even if they can be.
By requiring gardens to be inside, the city of Ellensburg may have hit on a way to keep them out of sight as well as stop the casual midnight theft of one or two handfuls of smokeable stuff. But they will raise the electric bills for heat and grow lights.
Does Ellensburg have any such gardens? “Not that I’m aware of. We don’t think so,” City Attorney Jim Pidduck said. Different cities are doing different things, he said. “Everybody’s just struggling to come up with the appropriate response.”
Unclear, however, is whether a garden actually has to have growing marijuana plants. Could a collective garden merely have the harvested product, which it could dispense – strike that, dispensaries are illegal – provide to members of the collective?
“We don’t know the answer to that,” said Candace Bock of the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington, which gets regular questions about the state of marijuana laws in the state.
Where they obtain that pre-grown product might have to be left to the imagination or the entrepreneurial spirits of the collective.
The Legislature is bound to take this all up in next year’s session, although whether they will make the situation better or worse is anyone’s guess. Steve Sarich of Canna Care, which operates dispensaries and clinics in the Seattle area, is suing the state over vagueness in the new law rather than waiting for a do-over in the Legislature.
Even if the law gets changed for the better, it’s not likely to take effect until sometime next summer, Sarich said. “What are medical marijuana patients supposed to do until then?”
  


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Nick Deshais covers Spokane City Hall for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here