ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

Spin Control

Red light cameras might require public vote

OLYMPIA – Cities that want to install cameras to catch motorists who run red lights or speed through school zones would have to get voter approval under bills before the Legislature.
They might also have to make the yellow light last a bit longer at intersections with cameras or set the lights so they are red in all directions for at least a second. They wouldn’t be able to promise a share of the ticket revenue to the company that sells them the cameras.
Traffic ticket cameras started as a pilot project several years ago and “turned into a big problem in Washington state,” Rep. Christopher Hurst, D-Enumclaw, told the House Transportation Committee Tuesday. He proposed two different bills, using different standards for setting up the system; but both would require voter approval whenever a city starts or expands a red light camera program.
  



The public opposes them, and if the Legislature doesn’t make changes, a statewide initiative might, Hurst said: “Fifteen states have banned these things.”
Tim Eyman, who is working on several local initiatives against traffic cameras, underscored that warning and said opposition runs the gamut from the American Civil Liberties Union to constitutional conservatives: “I have never seen a government program create so much public antipathy.”
Another bill may be introduced in the coming days simply to repeal the law that allows cities to set the cameras up, but that measure wasn’t before the committee Tuesday.
Local law enforcement officials defended the cameras, calling the cameras a safety tool that takes the place of a traffic cop at a dangerous intersection. They review video of cars running red lights or speeding, and reject citations they find questionable.
“The safety of motorists is the primary goal,” Lt. Cory Darlington of the Tacoma Police Department said. “The secondary outcome is revenue.”
But officers from Seattle, Tacoma, Lakewood and Auburn said their cities do collect revenue from the cameras, and that’s after paying the company that installed them between $4,500 and $5,000 a month per camera.
Some committee members seemed skeptical of claims that the cameras have a major impact on accidents. They wondered if at least part of the reduction was from longer yellow lights which often accompany the cameras, or restrictions on using cell phones in cars.
  


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Nick Deshais covers Spokane City Hall for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here