Former U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton had a logical, sensible suggestion last week when releasing his proposal for Washington’s new congressional districts.
So logical and sensible, in fact, that it has almost no chance of happening….
To read the rest of this item, go inside the blog.
Gorton suggested the state renumber its 10 districts in such a way that they make some logical sense. Start on the West Coast with the 1st District, move east and finish at the Idaho border.
In other words, most Spokesman-Review readers in Washington would find themselves in the 10th District rather than the 5th.
Right now, the numbering system defies any semblance of logic or numeracy. The 1st and 2nd are in the Puget Sound, and the 3rd stretches from Olympia down to Vancouver, Central Washington has 4th, Eastern Washington the 5th. Then it’s back to the Puget Sound for the other numbers, fit in wherever some previous commission could cobble together enough people when a new district was granted the state.
Originally, the districts did make sense. When Washington had two, One was on the West Side and Two on the East Side. Things stayed pretty logical until Pugetopolis started outgrowing the sunnier side of the state and a series of districts had to be carved out of there.
Gorton didn’t suggest renumbering the legislative districts, although they’re even more jumbled. Originally those numbers started in the east and moved west. Slowly, some of the single digit districts were plucked from this side and dropped across the Cascades.
Elected officials tend to be fond of their district numbers. Sometimes campaign speech writers or political pundits come up with catchy alliterative titles, like the Fighting 1st or the Sunny 2nd.
But it’s not clear how much the residents care about them, if at all. Raise your hands if you know which legislative district you’re in. Now keep them up if you know which one you inhabited in 2000 and 1990, the last two times the districts were redrawn. (Even if you didn’t move, the boundaries did.)
Even if you didn’t move, the districts did. In 1991, Spokane County lost a legislative district, the 5th, to King County. Keep your hand up if you know whether you used to live in the 5th Legislative District.
Not too many hands up out there.
So it wouldn’t do violence to the body politic to renumber the districts to conform to geographic logic. But it’s unlikely it will happen. The other three commissioners were somewhat less than lukewarm to the proposal.
Democrat Dean Foster, another redistricting commissioner who served on the panel 10 years ago, said he recalled one of the Republican members in 2001 had passed on a similar suggestion. The origin of that proposal?