ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here

Spin Control

Tax-cut vote splits House delegations

This week’s votes to keep income tax rates from rising for most Americans split the House delegations in Washington and Idaho, but unified the two state’s senators behind the last-minute deal.

Two Washington Democrats in the House voted against the tax changes, while the state’s three other Democrats and all four Republicans voted yes.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., said Wednesday her vote was a close call that came down on the side of tax cuts: “My vote last night was to reduce taxes for as many Americans as possible.”

To read more reaction to the vote on tax cuts or to comment, click here to go inside the blog.


 

Many Republicans were concerned over the lack of spending cuts in the bill, she said. Eventually more House GOP members voted no, including some who are in leadership with McMorris Rodgers.

“It was a tough vote for everyone,” she said. “The take-away is a determination from Republicans that we are going to get spending cuts, going forward.”

The lack of spending cuts caused Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, to blast the agreement as “worse than no deal at all.” He voted no, while Idaho’s other House member, Mike Simpson, voted yes.

The nation’s budget problems can’t be fixed by solely by collecting more revenue, Labrador said in a prepared statement: “Both parties must rein in out-of-control spending. Today, I’m not sure if either party is serious about reducing our debts and deficits.”

Democrat Patty Murray, Washington’s senior senator and chairwoman of that chamber’s Budget Committee, said Congress will tackle spending cuts in the coming months. They will have to address  hard choices, including decisions made in the previous decade to go to war and expand Medicare without paying for it, she said. 

The deal that was reached protects middle class taxpayers, she said, and extends a tax break for Washington and other states that have a sales tax but no income tax. Part of the agreement over tax rates puts off automatic across-the-board cuts to discretionary spending, known as sequestration, for only two months.

“Our feet are to the fire,” Murray said. “Sequestration could be very harmful… the worst of all worlds.”

Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, doesn’t believe those automatic cuts are the worst possible outcome. He voted for the tax cuts, saying the deal was clearly about taxes – the main focus of the public – not about spending. It made the cuts initiated by President George W. Bush permanent, and the threshold for tax increases is higher than President Obama campaigned on, he said.

“That fight’s behind us,” Risch said.

The public has a right to expect Congress will tackle spending, but Risch said he’s “very cynical” that it will be any more successful than past efforts. That’s why he supported sequestration in the bill that set up the “fiscal cliff” and thinks it will be necessary later this year.

“They have proven themselves not able to deal with spending cuts,” he said of Congress, adding “I hope I’m dead wrong on this.”


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to Spin Control

Get blog updates by email

About this blog

Jim Camden is a veteran political reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Jonathan Brunt is an enterprise reporter for The Spokesman-Review.


Kip Hill is a general assignments reporter for The Spokesman-Review.

Latest comments »

Read all the posts from recent conversations on Spin Control.

Search this blog
Subscribe to this blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertise Here