Posts tagged: inititiatives
OLYMPIA — Washington business groups, including Greater Spokane Inc., are taking turns dissing Initiative 1125, a proposal that would put restrictions on the way state sets and spends tolls on roads and bridges.
The Association of Washington Business recommended a vote against I-1125 last week at its annual “policy summit.”
GSI, the Greater Vancouver Chamber of Commerce, Greater Seattle Chamber, Renton Chamber, Washington Roundtable and state Realtors Association also urged a “no” vote, using words like irresponsible, dangerous and — horror of horrors! — politicizing.
The third and final initiative in the blocks for the Nov. 8 election cleared the signature stage Monday night.
Initiative 1163, which requires training and background checks for home health care workers, turned in some 340,000 signatures, which was a cushion of almost 100,000 over the required amount. It had a better than average invalidation rate on signatures in the spot checks, the Secretary of State's office reported.
So state wide voters have a chance to vote on privatized liquor, road tolls, and home health care requirements.
Spokane city voters will also have a Community Bill of Rights charter amendment on that ballot. The Spokane City Council moved that measure to the ballot at its Monday night session. You can read this morning's story on that decision here.
OLYMPIA —In a case that may involve the most careless or most blatant example of signature fraud in Washington political history, elections officials turned over petitions with as many as 349 bogus signatures to the State Patrol Forensics Lab. The volunteer who submitted them in could face felony fraud charges.
The suspect’s name is being withheld, but elections officials have confirmed this much about her: She is a member of the Service Employees International Union, which is backing Initiative 1098, but wasn’t being paid for her efforts.
(The I-1098 campaign paid for signatures, too, but there’s no apparent problems with those petitions, nor on any of the other petitions that have been checked so far for proposals that paid for sigs. That tends to support the contention of Eddie “Spaghetti” Agazarm, signature gathering professional, who insists his checkers can spot a forgery across the room and it’s the true believers, not the paid workers, who have the motivation to cheat the system.)
The suspect may have misunderstood the verification process, which is often referred to as a “spot check” when initiative drives pass a certain milepost. Before the spot check of 3 percent of the signatures is conducted, however, all the sheets are examined for names that are illegible, have missing signatures or addresses or other obvious errors.
It was during that process that elections workers noticed six sheets that stood out because they were all in the same ink, and seemed to be in the same handwriting, David Ammons, a spokesman for the secretary of state’s office, said: “There was no real effort to have the look and feel of a petition sheet, which is normally quite varied.”
Think about it, folks. Twenty different people sign a standard petition sheet, often with different pens, at diferent times and in different places. They usually look a bit ragged by the time they get to the elections office.
Elections workers noticed that the same gatherer’s name was on the back of each sheet. They pulled all of her sheets, and found more that seemed to be in the same handwriting. Some appear to be actual voters, but the signatures are bogus, others have bad addresses, Ammons said. In the end, 89 percent of the signatures that gatherer submitted were bad; the average failure rate is about 18 percent.
Forensics experts will look at the sheets before the case is turned over to the King County prosecuting attorney, who would have the first call on filing criminal charges because that’s where the signature gatherer lives.
The questioned signatures represent about one-tenth of 1 percent of the total submitted and the remaining petitions for I-1098 checked out, Ammons said. They had a failure rate that was on track with the average for ballot measures.
“There seems to be no systematic effort to stuff the ballot box,” he said.
Sandeep Kaushik, a spokesman for the campaign, said the motive behind the alleged fraud “is still a mystery at this point.”
As far as he knows, the SEIU wasn’t offering any prizes or bonuses for signature gathering, so he doesn’t know of any financial motive for turning in phony signatures, if that’s in fact what happened, Kaushik said.
“We had more than 1,000 volunteers across the state,” he said. “I don’t want this to cast a cloud over that effort.”
I-1098 got about a third of its signatures, around 120,000, from volunteers and the remainder from paid collectors.
OLYMPIA — State elections officials say they suspect some of the signatures turned in for Initiative 1098, the proposed state income tax proposal, may be phony.
Elections Director Nick Handy said the office suspects 20 petition sheets, with about 350 names, are being investigated. All the sheets were signed by the same signature gatherer, Handy said in a press release.
The office notified the state patrol, the state attorney general’s office and local law enforcement authorities, and expects to have a thorough review of all the names completed in a few days. It would “vigorously pursue” any violation of the fraud laws, Secretary of State Sam Reed said.
Because the state is involved in several legal battles over the public release of initiative petitions, it can’t make the sheets public. The people on the petitions will be contacted.
The questioned sheets are a small fraction of the 24,817 sheets turned in by I-1098 supporters. Not counting the sheets with questioned signatures, they have 385,061 signatures, and the required minimum is 241,153. Checkers are working at “heightened awareness” of possible fraud, Handy said.
“At this point, it looks like an isolated problem with one gatherer submitting 20 bad petition sheets, and this should not affect the underlying initiative check,” Handy said.