We have our follow story on the Cal game for you to read along with out look back. Hope you enjoy them both. Read on.
••••••••••
• Here’s the story …
PULLMAN – As any husband knows, when your wife starts talking to you about something, it’s probably time to listen – and make a change.
“When I got on the bus, my wife (said to) me, ‘we’ve got to do something about starting off faster,’ ” Washington State football coach Paul Wulff said Sunday. “I’m like, ‘I know, everybody knows.’ ”
They know, yes, but they don’t know how to change it.
Wulff had to admit that to his wife Sherry and everyone else after last Saturday’s 49-17 loss at California. Helped by poor special teams play, defensive lapses and offensive mistakes, the Bears jumped out to 21-0 and 35-3 leads.
“Our kids talk about it, we talk about it,” Wulff said of the slow starts that have plagued WSU all season. “We talk about what we’ve got to do different, what we can do to start faster.”
Though the self-examination hasn’t yielded answers, there are possible explanations.
“When you have some youth in there or you have an injury or two during the week, you’re going to have some ups and downs,” Wulff said. “When you’re building a program, it’s not always consistent.”
But such explanations are starting to wear thin, even to Wulff.
As the Cougars emerged from their bye week, practice took on a more demanding tone.
Expectations expressed quietly the first half of the season earned a more strident review on the practice field and in team meetings.
After Saturday’s loss, the emphasis in the post-game locker room was not just on getting better but building the belief they were better – and needed to start playing that way.
“We’ve got to the midpoint of the year and we’ve had reasons for where we’re at,” Wulff said of a record that’s reached 1-6 overall and 0-5 in the Pac-10. “But we want to take another step as a team and as coaches. I think in some areas we really did that Saturday. In some areas we didn’t.”
It’s those latter areas that were addressed after the game.
“We want to make sure we’re slowly raising the bar,” Wulff said. “And raising the bar of our own expectations. Really that’s all it is.”
The goal is to keep growing as a team, he emphasized.
“It’s important that we do that and it’s important that they all understand that’s where we want to head,” Wulff said. “Sometimes you’ve got to make it clear it’s important for all of us to do that.”
The Cougars next chance for growth comes Saturday in San Antonio. They’ll face national power Notre Dame at the Alamo Dome in an off-campus home game for the Irish, something the school wants to do often in the future. Oddsmakers have established 4-2 Notre Dame as a 30-point favorite in the nationally televised game.
“They’re a good team,” Wulff said, “but I like the opportunity for our team and our program right now. This is a great stage for our young football team.”
And, if that team wants to take a curtain call, it will need to hit its marks from the opening lines.
••••••
• And here’s the look back …
Cal 49, WSU 17
• High point of the game
For the second consecutive week we highlight a hookup between freshman quarterback Jeff Tuel and junior Johnny Forzani, the latter with less football experience than most freshmen. Trailing 35-3 early in the second quarter – after Jahvid Best’s 61-yard scoring run through the middle of the WSU defense – the Cougars were in danger of repeating last year’s 66-3 debacle. But Tuel showed again why the WSU coaching staff is so high on him, ignoring a quickly decaying pocket, stepping up and delivering the ball some 50 yards down the middle to Forzani, who had used his speed to get behind the defense. “I try to give him all the time in the world, because I know he can run,” Tuel said before adding, “It looked like I could have thrown it a little bit farther too.” It was good enough for a 68-yard score.
• Low point of the game
There were so many to choose from in the first 20 minutes, from the Bears’ 76-yard punt return to Best’s two scores. But we’re going with the Cougars’ second legitimate scoring chance. It came on WSU’s initial second-quarter possession and was a result of freshman Carl Winston’s first breakout run, a 37-yard sprint around left end. When Winston was finally run out of bounds at the Cal 35, WSU had a chance to cut into the 28-3 lead. But three plays gained just three yards, leaving kicker Nico Grasu facing a 49-yard field goal. The junior, who has struggled at times this year, hit the ball well. It looked as if the Cougars would get on the board. But the end-over-end kick came down solidly on the crossbar, bouncing back toward the end zone. Grasu stared, dropped his head and jogged back to the sideline.
• A pat on the back
The receiving corps has been in flux all season, in part due to the early defections of Jeshua Anderson and Kevin Norrell, two of its rare experienced members. But that’s starting to change. Forzani is emerging as a deep threat, Gino Simone and Jared Karstetter have become reliable possession receivers – Simone, a freshman, caught his first collegiate touchdown and Karstetter matched Simone’s six catches. But the emerging receiver is Jeffrey Solomon, who led WSU with seven catches. The transfer from Eastern Washington made two acrobatic snags and finished with a game-high 81 yards.
• Needs fixing
Depth is an area that has to be addressed in recruiting and, with 16 verbal commitments already, the Cougars are trying to do just that. The depth, or lack of, showed again versus Cal at the linebacker position. With Louis Bland on crutches, and probably out for the season, and Alex Hoffman-Ellis limited by his staph infection recovery, WSU relied on seldom-used Mike Ledgerwood at middle linebacker. The sophomore came through admirably – he had a career-high eight tackles – but lacks the speed of Hoffman-Ellis or the playmaking capability of Bland. And, when Andy Mattingly had to sit with a leg injury, walk-on Joshua Garrett had to fill in. The inexperience showed.
Three unanswered questions
• Will WSU put all phases together in one game? One week the defense forces a half-dozen turnovers. The next game the offense explodes for more than 400 yards. The special teams shine one game, break down the next. There has already been a game where nothing worked – Oregon – so when will there be a game where everything works? If there is, expect the Cougars to win. They have enough pieces now that if all of them come together at the same time, the can play with any team left on the schedule.
• How much longer will 32-point losses be considered progress? Listening to the coaching staff the past week, and especially after Saturday’s defeat, that point might have already passed. Despite the youth, despite the injuries, despite everything, it seems like Paul Wulff and his assistants are expecting more. They seem to be getting tired of moral victories, making Saturday’s unnecessary and drive-killing penalties, missed tackles, special team lapses, the close-but-no-cigar effort, unacceptable.
• Can WSU upset Notre Dame? The simple answer is yes. The Fighting Irish might be 5-2, but they haven’t been impressive, winning four games by seven points or less. And they aren’t want you would call speed merchants, the type that causes WSU’s defense problems. And the game is not being played in South Bend, with all its tradition and interesting officiating. If the Cougars can pass protect, force turnovers, and execute on special teams, this game will be closer than most experts think.
•••
• That’s all for now. As always, we’ll be back in the morning. Until then …
spokanecougfan on October 25 at 9:18 p.m.
Wow. Finally someone has said it outloud in the media,… ” How much longer will 32-point losses be considered progress?” I would hope not much longer! People can try and minimize Doba’s group of kids, who are now playing their way out of the system, as having little or no talent, but when you combine that assumption with the fact that PW refused to even consider JC hopefuls to fill in behind, and you’re just asking for what we’ve gotten. Losses, big losses. I think this years would have been bigger, but some Pac-10 teams are down a bit and I also think they’re showing mercy on us quite frankly.
The bottom line is that there is NO progress here. We’re still getting the crap kicked out of our kids every weekend and no one on the coaching staff has a clue what to do about it!?!? None of us has access to the lockerroom,all kinds of conjecture can be made, but we pay a coach to have these answers and to produce for the student athletes, the school and the region a ‘successful’ program. Not a win every game program but one that wins more than it loses and graduates players into a life beyond football. Maybe that latter is happening but there is no progress and no success on the field. PW and his staff are in over their collective heads and need help. Sterk had better get creative very quickly or this is not going to be a tailspin WSU can pull out of.
Shaun on October 25 at 9:28 p.m.
How to change it? Add about a dozen legitimate D-1 caliber football players on each side of the ball. And that takes time. Having 16 verbals already doesn’t mean a thing if they’re 16 bad football players and/or bad students who won’t qualify academically (for the record, I’m not asserting that’s the case, I’m just raising the point). Get back to me when these kids are on campus, registered for class, and practicing with the team.
I do like what I’ve seen from Tuel (when he has time) and the receiving corps. This defense is gonna give up 40-plus to Lacrosse-Washtucna, but at least they’re starting to look like a offense that has a chance to put 28 on the board against a lot of teams.
SaveFerris on October 25 at 11:59 p.m.
The talent is young and mostly on the bench. We won’t know what we have in Wulff or the program until next year and probably beyond. Wulff needs to do enough to give people hope. He has shown he can recruit from day 1 and the class they are putting together this year would give him a 2 class foundation necessary to compete. Hopefully they can keep most of it together. They are obviously going to need to grow up very very quickly for a lot of people.
They have improved this year but it isn’t the kind of improvement that is going to give people a lot of hope just yet. All you have to do is look back at game 1 against Stanford. They did look better but we were still just sooo slow. They were bigger but that isn’t all there is to being really good athletes. Now add in all the injuries on defense (Wolfgramm, Kooyman, Bland, Hoffman-Ellis, Simmons, Daniels, and we already have forgot about Cory Mackay) and things are not going to improve to the extent that we are going to stop teams especially at the top of the conference. Same deal on offense with the line being gutted due to injury. All I hope is that we can keep Tuel healthy the last 5 games of the season.
Wulff had a learning curve that has been made all the bigger because of so much incredibly bad luck. We won’t know what we have until next year when the first full class is on the field. Nobody wants to hear it but all we really need to show some patience..
wazzuwyatt on October 26 at 7:08 a.m.
Two games, if all goes well, could make this a satisfying season. If the Cougs beat the Irish, on national TV to boot, that would get national news attention. I think it’s possible. And, to finish the season somewhat satisfactorily would be a victory over the Dawgs. Two years go, when WSU’s only win was a victory over UW at their stadium was considered a HAPPY ending by nearly all Coug fans.
I have a feeling the Cougs will do well vs. Arizona, too. I have a hunch, if Tuel can stay healthy, that that a remaining game or two or 3 will be a happy ending of this season. A HUNCH!
ThaiCoug on October 26 at 9:47 p.m.
wazzuwyatt, I wouldn’t go to Vegas for a few months while you calm down. I still think we have the right coach and will give it another year before I acknowledge if I was wrong.
I again raise the point that PW’s “kids” are really only this year’s freshmen. The first group, while with some good one’s, was a scramble to put together anything. Doba had not recruited ONE commit before being dismissed.