Arrow-right Camera


Pac-10 starts football divisional process


The Pac-10 started down the road toward the Pac-12 on Friday, as the athletic directors of the 12 schools met for the first in what could be a few conferences aimed at ironing out the football schedule. To have a championship game – and the conference wants a championship game – there has to be two six-team divisions. How those divisions will be configured has to be worked out, more than likely by October. We know for sure Utah will join in 2011, with Colorado trying to move up its Big 12 withdrawal date so it can start play the same year. If that's not possible, the Buffs will be a 2012 participant. We have the unedited version of our story on today's meeting on the link, so read on.

• Here is the raw version of the story, which concentrates on what the changes might mean to Washington State ...

LOS ANGELES – The Pac-10 Conference athletic directors, joined by their counterparts from soon-to-be-league members Utah and Colorado, took some of the first steps toward defining the new league Friday.

The group, meeting at a Beverly Hills hotel, discussed the future of the conference when it expands to 12 teams, which could happen next year but by 2012 at the latest.

Progress was made, according to Washington State athletic director Bill Moos, but the issue of revenue sharing took center stage.

"It's something we're going to have to clarify before we take the next step," Moos said. "It will be a determining factor in regards to that insistence of getting into that LA market, especially for the Northwest schools."

Under the current conference bylaws, television revenue isn't split down the middle, as is the case in the Big Ten and some other major conferences. Instead, the game's participants receive 55 percent of the game's revenue, with the rest divided among the other conference members. Schools that appear on television more often earn more money.

With the Pac-10's television contracts with Fox Sports Net and ESPN expiring in 2011, the revenue from a new agreement – negotiations are set to begin in January – is expected to increase markedly.

With a new television deal and other changes, including a football championship game, estimates of as much as $40- to $50-million more for the conference have been floated.

Which is why WSU, which typically receives less money from television than any other conference school, see a 50-50 split as paramount.

"I would love to see a more equitable revenue-sharing formula," Moos said of the school's priorities. "That's first and foremost. Secondly, I would like to see the Northwest schools continue to play each year and secure those rivalries.

"And thirdly, try to have a presence in LA as often as possible, which probably would mean going to nine conference games, for the recruiting benefit."

The main thrust of Friday's meeting was expected to revolve around the issue of dividing the conference's 12 teams into two divisions for football. The split is not only necessary for scheduling but to allow a Pac-10 championship game.

The two main proposals were a geographic split, with Washington State, Washington, Oregon State and Oregon joining new members Utah and Colorado in a northern division while Cal, Stanford, UCLA, USC, Arizona State and Arizona comprise the south.

But that would limit the Pacific Northwest's school exposure in California, crucial for revenue under the current formula and key in recruiting the state's fertile grounds.

The other option would be to split each rival into opposite divisions, as if with a zipper. One reported plan had Washington, Oregon State, Stanford, UCLA, Arizona State and Utah in one division and WSU, Oregon, Cal, USC, Arizona and Colorado in the other. Each school would play their rival every year, though if the game were kept at the end of the season as currently scheduled, there could be a rematch a week later in the title game.

The thought of moving the rivalry games to the middle of the season didn't have much traction, Moos said, making the zipper plan less attractive. A revenue split would also ease the pain for the Northwest schools losing their guaranteed yearly trips to California.

"There are different agendas," Moos said, "but none of those could be discussed at any great lengths until we hammer out what the revenue sharing is going to be."

Pac-10 conference commissioner Larry Scott has said repeatedly he wants to have a proposal to present when the presidents and challencors meet in San Francisco on Oct. 21.

Moos said the athletic directors will participate in a conference call in the near future, with the goal of reaching agreement on the issues. From there, a proposal should be submitted to the Pac-10 Council, made up of athletic directors, senior women’s administrators and faculty representatives, prior to its meeting Oct. 6.

With a budget of around $30 million, the smallest in the Pac-10, Moos knows what WSU's priority is.

"The revenue-sharing, for Washington State, is the biggest item in all of this," he said, "especially as we are going into television negotiations here next year."


• That's it for tonight. We'll be back in the morning. Until then ...

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus
« Back to SportsLink

Vince Grippi
Vince Grippi is a freelance local sports blogger for He also contributes to the SportsLink Blog.

Follow Vince online:

Looking for a Grip on Sports?

Vince Grippi's daily take on all things regional sports has been moved to our main sports section online. You can find a collection of these columns here.