Idaho officials have wrestled for years with proposals that would allow guided hunting for waterfowl and turkeys.
In 1988, the interested parties – including the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Idaho Outfitters and Guides Licensing Board and the Idaho Outfitter and Guides Association – set a May 1989 deadline to resolve the issue.
More than two decades later, the topic still bedevils.
Professional guides and landowners argue guided turkey and waterfowl hunting will create jobs and provide hunting opportunities on land already closed to regular hunters.
Hunters are against the idea. They believe guiding will lead landowners to charge fees on properties currently open to hunters. That will lead to fewer places to hunt and more crowding on public land, they say.
To break the loggerhead, officials are trying to survey 4,000 private landowners.
“We want to get a perspective about how landowners use their lands for hunting and if there are any commercial entities already involved,” said Jake Howard, executive director of the licensing board.
If the survey finds landowners have already closed their property to Joe Blow hunter, it could pave the way to allowing for guided hunting in the future.
“One of the arguments for allowing guiding is that land was already being leased and the days of knocking on doors to ask for permission are gone forever,” said Jeff Knetter, a Fish and Game staff biologist who has participated in the guiding debate for years. “The survey could answer that question.”
Once the survey is complete, Howard said the licensing board will make a proposal, that will be completely vetted by the public. The licensing board makes the final decision, not Fish and Game.
“We need to make a decision one way or another,” he said.
Like Howard and Knetter, Nampa’s Bryce Cook is waiting eagerly for the survey results.
Cook is a member of the Idaho Waterfowl Association, which represents 70 waterfowl hunters who are against guided hunting for ducks, geese and turkeys.
“We are against any expansion of waterfowl guiding on private or public land,” he said. “We are against it primarily because of loss of access and limited opportunity already. There is no need to commercialize it more.”
Cook argues that allowing guided hunting would have a trickle-down effect in which more and more land is locked up and nonguided hunters will eventually have no other way to hunt than to pay.
“Look at pheasant hunting in South Dakota,” he said. “You can’t get any good access without paying a guide. Does Idaho want that?”
A decision could come this year. Or it could come in 20 years.
With this issue, you never know.
sponsored Jargon is confusing, by definition. And the financial world has its own set of cryptic words.