Arrow-right Camera

Nation/World

Watt Charged In Probe Accused Of Lying To Congress About Channeling Hud Funds

Thu., Feb. 23, 1995

President Reagan’s controversial interior secretary James G. Watt was charged Wednesday with lying to Congress and a federal grand jury about his use of political connections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to help private landlords and developers obtain millions of dollars in low-income housing funds.

Watt, 57, the highest-ranking former government official to be charged in the long-running HUD investigation, was charged in a 25-count indictment with lying about his work as a consultant, for which he was paid more than $500,000 in the mid-1980s. He worked with private clients seeking funds for low-income housing projects in Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

The grand jury also accused Watt of obstructing justice by lying to FBI agents for more than four years, insisting as recently as this month that he kept no records to document his consulting work or his meetings with top HUD officials, including then-Secretary Samuel R. Pierce Jr.

Independent counsel Arlin M. Adams accused Watt, who served as interior secretary from 1981 to 1983, of hindering his investigation into HUD corruption. The probe began nearly five years ago and has cost more than $17 million. Adams said in a statement that Watt “materially interfered with this office’s ability to investigate and prosecute criminal conduct, and has added substantially to the investigation’s length and its cost to the American taxpayers.”

Adams said that Watt’s cover-up betrayed the public trust, as did his efforts to ensure that scarce HUD funds were awarded “to the dictates of favored insiders, rather than the needs of the poor.”

Specifically, Watt is charged with lying when he testified on June 9, 1989, before a congressional subcommittee headed by Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., that was investigating corruption at HUD. He also is charged with lying in a June 6, 1990, letter to the FBI about his inability to comply with a subpoena for documents, and in his Nov. 21, 1990, testimony before a grand jury.


 
Tags: ethics

Click here to comment on this story »