Russia has never had an election with stakes this high. For the first time in their 1,000-year history, Russians have a real choice about what kind of country they will have.
Sunday’s presidential election is not about fine shadings and subtle differences. The outcome will shape the future of the largest nation on the planet, a nuclear power spanning two continents and 11 time zones.
Five years after the Soviet collapse, Russia is still a country on the cusp, wavering between reform and retreat, between an unclear future and a troubled Communist past.
About 106 million people are eligible to vote. Some find the prospect of such a fateful choice daunting, and they’ll stay away - or mark “against everyone” on their ballots. But the majority - perhaps 70 percent or more - are expected to vote.
The first polling stations opened in Chukotka in the Far East at noon PDT on Saturday; the last are to close at noon PDT today. Absentee balloting and voting on ships and in some remote regions began earlier.
About 1,500 Russian troops serving in the NATO-led peace force in Bosnia voted Saturday, as did the seven Russians held hostage in Afghanistan for the last 10 months by a Muslim fundamentalist group.
Partial preliminary returns from the nation’s 93,500 voting stations are expected tonight. Experts say turnout is a critical factor, especially for President Boris Yeltsin.
But the outcome is far from certain.
Will Russians give Yeltsin and his promise to turn Russia into a capitalist democracy another chance? Will they choose Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov and his nostalgia-soaked vision of a secure superpower? Or will they choose one of the eight others, who stand somewhere in-between?
Most polls say Yeltsin and Zyuganov are likely to face each other in a runoff next month and they give Yeltsin the edge in a second round.
The race had many trappings of a Western-style campaign, but with dark warnings of fraud and violence. Few expect today’s election to produce a clear winner and a graceful loser.
Yeltsin, 65, went into the race as an ailing underdog nipping at Zyuganov’s heels.
Russians were fed up with the unfairness of reforms that impoverished millions and enriched a few. They were fed up with crime, corruption and the war in Chechnya. Zyuganov promised Soviet-style security and a new era of national greatness.
But a suddenly revitalized Yeltsin launched a steamroller campaign fueled by every imaginable advantage of incumbency.
He raided the budget and the Central Bank to pay for extravagant campaign promises. The national media became a cheerleader that gave him slavish, lavish prime-time coverage.
Perhaps most importantly, Yeltsin portrayed himself as the candidate of stability and the Communists as the agents of upheaval.
Some analysts say Yeltsin peaked too early and promised too much. Many people never got the back wages that were one of his central campaign promises.
But even on Saturday, when the campaign was officially over and political ads were banned, Yeltsin was still using his office to hand out money and get on the news. Films with a strong anti-Communist message, like the Academy Award-winning “Burnt by the Sun,” were being aired on television over the weekend.
TV showed Yeltsin handing out state arts prizes to leading cultural figures and reported two new decrees promising money for hard-hit regions of Siberia, where the Communists are strong.
I know it’s only rock ’n’ roll, but I like it when politicians decide to use familiar tunes as a sound track to their events, which might mean different things ...
Our most recent story about prolific Washington State wide receiver Gabe Marks tells the story of a particularly insightful interview we had last spring. That story, "Gabe Marks is a ...
I'm facing another weekend of fence-building with my neighbor. Once we get the back fence built, I have one last honey-do item on the agenda and then it's kick back ...
S-R intern Tyson Bird brought cookies to work on his last day with us. It has been a pleasure to have him here. I first printed a column submission from ...
sponsored According to two 2015 surveys, 62 percent of Americans do not have enough savings to handle an unexpected emergency, much less any long-term plans.