April 29, 2005 in Nation/World

Protesters win suit on use of pepper spray

Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO – Law enforcement officers from two northern California counties were found liable Thursday for using excessive force by swabbing pepper spray in the eyes of logging protesters in 1997. A jury awarded eight plaintiffs $1 each.

It was the third trial in the case; the first two ended in deadlocked juries in 1998 and 2004.

The plaintiffs laughed and hugged outside the courtroom – and applauded when jurors left their chambers.

“They did the right thing,” said Terri Slanetz, a 42-year-old naturalist from Oakland.

“We’ve been trying all along to get a statement that this was illegal. It’s a positive step toward people treating each other decently.”

The protesters claim their civil rights were violated when Humboldt County sheriff’s deputies and Eureka police officers swabbed pepper spray directly in their eyes during the 1997 protest.

The protesters argued the pepper spray was used to illegally punish and intimidate them for chaining themselves together and making it difficult for authorities to arrest them.

Attorneys said the verdict would prevent the use of pepper spray on nonviolent protesters.

“The plaintiffs were never in it for the money. They were in it for the principle,” attorney Tony Serra said.

© Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Get stories like this in a free daily email

Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus