Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

U.N. conference on nuclear treaty ends in failure; many blame U.S.

Jonathan S. Landay Knight Ridder

WASHINGTON – A month-long conference on bolstering the key global treaty to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons ended in failure Friday, with delegates wrangling on new safeguards and Iran and the United States exchanging bitter charges over their nuclear policies.

The 188-nation Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference collapsed despite unanimous recognition of gaps that have allowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons-related technologies and fueled fears that terrorists could acquire a nuclear device.

Delegates and arms-control experts who monitored the proceedings at the United Nations placed much of the blame for the failure on the United States and Iran.

Washington, they said, spent most of its energy seeking action on Iranian and North Korean nuclear weapons programs. They said the United States blocked discussions of Bush administration plans to upgrade the U.S. nuclear arsenal, its strategy of continued reliance on nuclear weapons and its rejection of a global ban on nuclear test blasts.

Iran, which insists its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, spurned any effort that would hold it accountable for hiding a uranium enrichment program – used to produce fuel for power plants and bombs – for 20 years, they said.

Many countries were angry with the United States because of what they charged was the Bush administration’s refusal to affirm earlier U.S. commitments to the eventual elimination of all nuclear weapons, delegates and arms-control experts said.

“If governments simply ignore or discard commitments whenever they prove inconvenient, we will never be able to build an edifice of international cooperation and confidence in the security realm,” Paul Meyer, the head of the Canadian delegation, said in remarks clearly aimed at Washington.

He criticized Iran for keeping its uranium enrichment program secret, contrary to the nonproliferation treaty’s terms. He also criticized North Korea’s withdrawal from the pact and its alleged development of nuclear warheads.

“Our community is weakened by the refusal of the delinquent to be held to account by its peers and by the defection from that community of a state without suffering any sanction,” he said.

The 1970 accord constitutes the cornerstone of the international system for averting the spread of history’s most destructive weapons. Signatories meet every five years to consider ways to close holes in the pact. They are required to decide issues by consensus.

The Non-proliferation Treaty limits nuclear weapons to the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain in return for commitments to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals. Pakistan and India, which also have nuclear weapons, and Israel, which has never declared its nuclear arsenal, have refused to join the treaty.

In exchange for forswearing nuclear weapons, other countries that have signed the treaty are given access to civilian nuclear technologies under monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency.