April 20, 2006 in Nation/World

Bush shuffles staff

Dan Balz Washington Post

WASHINGTON – In a White House known for both defiance and optimism, Wednesday’s senior staff changes represent a frank acknowledgement of the trouble in which President Bush now finds himself. They are also a signal of how starkly Bush’s second-term ambitions have shifted after a year of persistent problems at home and abroad.

Longtime Bush confidant Karl Rove – who had hoped to use his position of deputy chief of staff to usher in an expansive conservative agenda – was relieved of his policy portfolio to concentrate on long-term strategy and planning for a November midterm election that looks increasingly bleak for Republicans.

Rove likely will remain one of the most influential voices in the White House, but his shift in responsibilities suggests that new White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten intends to operate a different White House than his predecessor, Andrew H. Card Jr., who resigned after more than five years at the helm.

Bolten’s White House, say former administration officials and Republican strategists, is likely to have clearer lines of authority and less freelancing by powerful officials. They also expect Bolten to play a more active and influential role in shaping domestic policy than did Card.

More significantly, they said, unlike Card, who took as his principal responsibility the management of the president, Bolten likely will operate more in the mold of chiefs of staff in previous administrations, who saw their role as managing the entire White House and sought to oversee the entire federal government as well.

Whether the changes will bring fundamental change in a troubled administration is another question. One of Bolten’s biggest challenges, say administration allies, will be to find ways to open up the Oval Office to new ideas and to the opinions of people who are not longtime Bush confidants.

On that score, many people who know the administration best are privately dubious. Presidents, more than chiefs of staff, determine how White Houses operate, they said, noting that Bush has shown that he prefers a tight circle of advisers and doesn’t welcome the advice of outsiders. As Bush put it on Monday, in asserting that he would not fire Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, “I’m the decider, and I decide what’s best.”

Rove’s return to a role that closely mirrors that which he played in Bush’s first term demonstrates how much this White House has now shifted to survival mode – and how far events have pushed the president from the grand ambitions with which he opened his second term just 15 months ago.

Then, with Rove as the animating force, the president sought to engineer Republican political dominance by remaking government with such far-reaching initiatives as his plan to remake the Social Security program. Today, Social Security stands as Exhibit A of what went wrong domestically in 2005.

Public disillusionment over Bush’s policies in Iraq have left the country in a sour mood and Bush’s presidency at low ebb, threatening the entire Bush-Rove project to create a durable Republican majority. While that goal remains central to the those closest to Bush, the focus at the White House for the foreseeable future will be trying to revitalize this presidency quickly enough to avoid crippling GOP losses in November that could thrust Bush into instant lame-duck status.

Realigning the White House staff and bringing in new faces appear central to that effort. This week’s changes include Wednesday’s resignation of White House press secretary Scott McClellan and appointment of Joel Kaplan as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for policy, as well as Monday’s announcement that U.S. trade representative and former House member Rob Portman would succeed Bolten as director of the Office of Management and Budget.

The domestic policy process has been hampered since Bolten went to OMB, and one Republican strategist close to the White House said the new chief of staff appears bent on trying to prevent Rove and others from interfering in every aspect of the governing process.

Rove will retain the “gravitational force” of his Bush relationship and could “overpower” Bolten in showdowns because he knows the president and the inside game better, this official predicted. But he added that Bolten believed that the strategy to overhaul Social Security was sloppy and hampered by Rove becoming too involved in every aspect of the campaign – policy, politics and communications.

Former administration officials said that Rove, though known for his ability to juggle many roles, was overwhelmed by the sheer volume of his responsibilities when he was promoted to deputy chief of staff after the 2004 election.

In addition, he was engulfed in the CIA leak case for providing false testimony about his role and remains under investigation by a special prosecutor.

Bolten and Rove forged a congenial working relationship during Bush’s first presidential campaign, when Rove was chief strategist and Bolten chief policy adviser. That carried over into the White House during the first term, until Bolten departed as deputy chief of staff to take over as OMB director. Administration allies say they hope that the new assignments can restore a operating arrangement that they believe worked well.

Other changes are expected at the White House and perhaps in Bush’s cabinet. Criticisms of the legislative affairs and communications operations as well as the national economic council suggest the potential scope of changes.

But one of the most important steps came Wednesday. As one strategist who has worked closely with the administration put it, “I don’t know how you change the White House without changing Karl’s role.”

Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email