Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

White House says spying was lawful

Richard B. Schmitt Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration ratcheted up its defense of a controversial domestic surveillance program Thursday, saying the power of the president to gather such intelligence during wartime was well established and had been practiced by revered commanders in chief.

In a new legal analysis defending the program, the Justice Department said that the inherent power of the president to order such warrantless surveillance was confirmed and enhanced by Congress after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The analysis argued that a 1978 law regulating intelligence-gathering in the United States did not close the door on surveillance that had not been approved by a special court created by that law, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The unusual 42-page “white paper” marked a stepped-up effort by the administration to mollify critics as public furor over the program, first disclosed last month, refuses to die. The Justice Department analysis mostly expounds on arguments that Bush and other officials have made about the program, although the timing of its release indicates that the White House is sensitive to the issue becoming a political liability.

The disclosure that Bush had, after the Sept. 11 attacks, secretly authorized the National Security Agency to monitor telephone calls and other communications involving possibly hundreds of people in the United States has triggered a fight with civil liberties groups and provoked legal and political concerns that cross party lines.

The legal rationale for the program has been questioned by the bipartisan Congressional Research Service. The Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee has announced hearings on the program early next month, with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales agreeing to appear.

Vice President Dick Cheney stepped up his defense of the program Thursday as well, saying that it was within the president’s constitutional authority to defend the country against its enemies.

“This is a wartime measure, limited in scope to surveillance associated with terrorists and conducted in a way that safeguards the civil liberties of our people,” Cheney said in a speech to the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank.

The administration has said that the surveillance program was aimed at monitoring communications in which one party was believed to have ties to al-Qaida or related terrorist networks. Officials have acknowledged that some innocent people were inadvertently monitored.

The Justice Department analysis reflects an expanded view of executive power – one that Bush and the Justice Department have claimed since the attacks on Washington and New York.

It asserts that Bush has “the chief responsibility under the Constitution to protect America from attack” and that Congress “confirmed and supplemented” that authority when, days after Sept. 11, it enacted a resolution empowering him to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to protect the nation.

In addition, the analysis contended that the program could be justified by history, pointing to spy programs authorized by President Roosevelt during World War II. It noted that George Washington was “a master of military espionage,” ordering his generals to find ways to intercept and open the mail of British redcoats without breaking the seals.