September 29, 2006 in Nation/World

Senate passes detainee bill

Charles Babington and Jonathan Weisman Washington Post


Bill highlights

A closer look at the legislation and what it means.

Page A6

WASHINGTON – Congress approved landmark changes to the nation’s system of interrogating and prosecuting terrorism suspects Thursday night, preparing the ground for possible military trials for key al-Qaida members under rules that critics say will draw stiff constitutional challenges.

The Senate joined the House in embracing President Bush’s view that the battle against terrorism justifies the imposition of extraordinary limits on defendants’ traditional rights in the courtroom. They include restrictions on a suspect’s ability to challenge his detention, examine all evidence against him, and bar testimony allegedly acquired through coercion of witnesses.

The Senate’s 65 to 34 vote marked a victory for Bush and fellow Republicans a month before the Nov. 7 elections as their party tries to make anti-terrorism a signature campaign issue. Underscoring that strategy, the House Thursday night voted 232 to 191 to authorize Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program.

Democrats resisted both measures and nearly amended the detainee bill to allow foreigners designated as enemy combatants to challenge their captivity by filing habeas corpus appeals with the federal courts. But Republicans held fast, gambling that Democrats will fail in their bid to convince voters that the GOP is sacrificing the nation’s traditions of justice and fairness in the name of battling terrorists and winning elections.

“As our troops risk their lives to fight terrorism, this bill will ensure they are prepared to defeat today’s enemies and address tomorrow’s threats,” Bush said after the vote.

With control of both houses possibly at stake this fall, Thursday’s debates were often impassioned and deeply partisan. House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, called Democrats “dangerous.” Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the nation is losing its “moral compass.”

The Senate approved the detainee legislation after Bush’s allies narrowly fended off five amendments. The vote on final passage drew support from 53 Republicans and 12 Democrats, while 32 Democrats, one independent and one Republican – Lincoln D. Chafee of Rhode Island – voted nay.

Slight differences in the Senate version of the bill means it must be returned to the House, where it is expected today to again easily win approval. Republican leaders then plan to forward the bill to the White House with a ceremony on Capitol Hill, part of the party’s effort to highlight its national security credentials before the November election.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., voted for the bill after telling reporters earlier that he would oppose it because it is “patently unconstitutional on its face.” He cited its denial of the habeas corpus right to military detainees. In an interview Thursday night, Specter said he decided to back the bill because it has several good items, “and the court will clean it up” by striking the habeas corpus provisions.

The Supreme Court triggered the congressional action by striking down in late June Bush’s earlier system for trying suspects in military commissions.

The new bill is designed to legalize military commissions and to clarify interrogation techniques that CIA officers may use on terrorism suspects considered “unlawful enemy combatants,” who are granted fewer protections than are prisoners of war. Hundreds of such detainees have been held for several years without trial at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, while others were held at secret prisons overseas.

The new measure rejects Bush’s earlier bid to narrow U.S. obligations under the Geneva Conventions in the treatment of such detainees. But it grants the executive branch substantial leeway in deciding how to comply with treaty obligations regulating actions that fall short of “grave breaches” of the conventions.

It would bar military commissions from considering testimony obtained through interrogation techniques that involve “cruel, unusual or inhumane treatment or punishment,” which the Constitution’s Fifth, Eighth and 14th amendments prohibit. The bar would be retroactive only to Dec. 30, 2005 – when Congress adopted the Detainee Treatment Act – to protect CIA operatives from possible prosecution over interrogation tactics used before that date.

Thursday’s main drama involved Specter’s bid to amend the bill to grant the habeas corpus right to foreign detainees. Habeas corpus appeals – a legal cornerstone – allow prisoners to ask a judge to rule on the legality of their detention.

Specter and his allies said the habeas corpus right must apply to all persons – including noncitizens – held in U.S. custody. Most other Republicans said foreigners designated by the military as “unlawful enemy combatants” do not deserve habeas corpus protections.

Specter’s amendment failed, 51 to 48. Senate Republicans voting for the habeas corpus amendment were Specter, Chafee, Gordon Smith of Oregon and John E. Sununu of New Hampshire. Ben Nelson of Nebraska was the only Democrat who opposed the amendment. Four amendments drafted by Democrats also failed, mostly along party lines.

Republicans, especially in the House, plan to use the military commission and wiretapping legislation as a one-two punch against Democrats this fall. The legislative action prompted extraordinarily blunt language from House GOP leaders, foreshadowing a major theme for the campaign. Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., issued a written statement on Wednesday declaring: “Democrat Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and 159 of her Democrat colleagues voted today in favor of MORE rights for terrorists.”

Democrats tried to deflect such attacks by focusing on the newly released National Intelligence Estimate, partially leaked on Saturday, which concludes that the Iraq war has become a “cause celebre” for terrorists. But Republicans maneuvered their attacks toward that issue as well.

“The Democrats’ jubilance with the national intelligence leak over the weekend underscores just how dangerous I think my friends on the other side of the aisle are when it comes to national security,” Boehner said Thursday.

Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email