December 13, 2007 in Nation/World

Veterans charities faulted in study

Philip Rucker Washington Post
 

Poor grades

The American Institute of Philanthropy gave F’s to 12 of the 29 military charities reviewed and D’s to eight. Five were awarded A-pluses. One group received an A, and one received an A-minus.

WASHINGTON – Americans gave millions of dollars in the past year to veterans charities designed to help troops wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan, but several of the groups spent relatively little money on the wounded, according to a leading watchdog organization and federal tax filings.

Eight veterans charities, including some of the nation’s largest, gave less than a third of the money raised to the causes they champion, far below the recommended standard, the American Institute of Philanthropy says in a report.

One group passed along 1 cent for every dollar raised, the report says. Another paid its founder and his wife a combined $540,000 in compensation and benefits last year, a Washington Post analysis of tax filings showed.

There are no laws regulating the amount of money charities spend on overhead, fundraising or giving. But the institute’s report suggests that 20 of the 29 military charities studied were managing their resources poorly, paying high overhead costs and direct-mail fundraising fees and, in some cases, providing their leaders with six-figure salaries.

The 12 charities rated as failing by the institute – including the Military Order of the Purple Heart Service Foundation, the AMVETS National Service Foundation and the Freedom Alliance – collected at least $266 million in the past fiscal year.

“They know how to work the system, and they seem pretty good at not going over the line, although it is pretty outrageous that so little money is actually winding up benefiting charities,” said Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the Chicago-based institute.

The charities’ practices have sparked outrage among some members of Congress.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was scheduled to hold its first hearing on veterans charities today.

“People want to help the veterans,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., a member of the oversight committee. “They don’t want to enrich organizations that are cynically exploiting veterans for their own personal gain.

Richard H. Esau Jr., executive director of the Military Order of the Purple Heart Service Foundation, based in Annandale, Va., said the cost of fundraising limits how much his group can spend on charitable causes. “Do you have any idea how much money it costs to advertise? It’s unbelievable the amount of money it takes to advertise in the print and electronic media,” he said. “I’m very proud of what we do, and we certainly do look after everybody. F or no F, the point is we do the right thing by veterans.”

Borochoff, said many veterans charities are “woefully inefficient,” spending large sums on costly direct-mail advertising.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus