February 7, 2007 in Nation/World

House Democrats plan rebuke of surge

David Espo Associated Press
 

related news

Iran links U.S. to abduction

» BAGHDAD, Iraq – Iranian officials in Iraq on Tuesday accused U.S. forces of collaborating with Iraqi soldiers in what they described as the kidnapping of an Iranian diplomat in downtown Baghdad.

» Four Iraqis allegedly involved in the kidnapping Sunday evening of diplomat Jalal Sarafi were arrested and interrogated by Iraqi police, according to two Iranian officials in Baghdad. The detained Iraqis, who wore military uniforms and carried military identification cards, were “not under the Ministry of Defense control; they were directly connected to the American control,” said an official at the Iranian Embassy who spoke on condition of anonymity.

» U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said Tuesday that the military was not involved in the reported abduction and that he was not aware of any involvement by Iraqi forces.

» Iraqi officials declined to comment Tuesday on the Iranian charges, but Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari scheduled a press conference for today where he was expected to discuss the issue.

Washington Post

WASHINGTON – Democratic critics of the Iraq war seized the offensive at both ends of the Capitol on Tuesday, disclosing plans for a symbolic rejection by the House of President Bush’s decision to deploy additional troops and filing legislation in the Senate to require withdrawal of U.S. military personnel.

Democrats pressured Bush to change course as Defense Secretary Robert Gates told lawmakers that U.S. forces might be able to start leaving Iraq before the end of the year – if daunting conditions including subdued violence and political reconciliation are met.

He also said that the buildup in troops is “not the last chance” to succeed in Iraq and added, “I would be irresponsible if I weren’t thinking about what the alternatives might be.”

The Pentagon is in the midst of implementing Bush’s order to raise troop levels by 21,500, part of a plan to help quell sectarian violence in Baghdad.

Bush’s decision to dispatch additional troops has become a flashpoint for critics of his Iraq policy in the new, Democratic-controlled Congress, whose lawmakers were elected last fall by a war-weary electorate.

Officials said that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, of California, and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, of Maryland, had both pledged to the Democratic rank and file that the House would vote next week on a nonbinding measure critical of Bush’s plan to add 21,500 forces. They also reassured lawmakers clamoring for more robust action that the vote would merely be the first attempt to pressure the president to shift course and that future legislation will be binding.

Democrats intend to allow all lawmakers time to speak on the issue across three days of debate beginning next Tuesday.

Under House rules, Democratic leaders have the authority to advance legislation to the floor for three days of debate, and there is little doubt they will have the votes to prevail.

That stands in contrast to the Senate, where Republicans have so far blocked an attempt by Democrats to hold a full-fledged debate on the war.

Two bills were unveiled during the day to force the president to move toward a troop withdrawal.

“The only people who believe there is a workable military solution for the conflict in Iraq is the Bush administration,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., in announcing legislation that would require Bush to “complete the redeployment” of American troops within a year.

Sen. Barack Obama, of Illinois, a Democratic presidential hopeful, joined two House members in proposing a measure to block Bush from implementing his planned troop increase and to begin a withdrawal by May 1, with all combat brigades out by March 31, 2008.

© Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email