February 13, 2007 in Nation/World

Reporters dispute Libby leak

Michael J. Sniffen Associated Press
Associated Press photo

Bob Woodward arrives at U.S. Federal Court in Washington on Monday.
(Full-size photo)

WASHINGTON – Three prominent journalists testified Monday that Bush administration officials volunteered leaks about a CIA operative, as Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s attorneys sought to suggest he was not responsible for exposing her.

The jury in Libby’s perjury trial heard a 66-second snippet of one of the deep background interviews given to Washington Post editor Bob Woodward for use in one of his books. They also saw a parade of Pulitzer-prize-winning journalists discuss who did and did not leak the information that set off a scandal and ultimately brought Libby to trial.

Woodward, who never wrote about Plame, and columnist Robert Novak, who first identified her in print, testified that then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage first told them in the summer of 2003 that the wife of prominent Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame, worked at the CIA.

Another Post reporter, Walter Pincus, testified that then-White House press secretary Ari Fleischer “suddenly swerved off” topic during an interview to tell him of her employment, contradicting a point in Fleischer’s testimony last week.

A major government witness, Fleischer testified Libby told him about Plame – earlier than Libby has told investigators he thought he first learned about her from NBC reporter Tim Russert.

On cross-examination, Fleischer also testified that he did not recall telling Pincus about Plame. The reporter’s testimony Monday was the most direct hit the defense made on the prosecution’s evidence that Libby lied to FBI agents and a grand jury about his talks with reporters about Plame and obstructed an investigation into how her name leaked.

Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, is not charged with the actual leak.

The defense did show Libby had numerous opportunities to leak Plame’s identity to reporters and did not. But none of Monday’s testimony went directly to the precise charges that he lied about his conversations with three other reporters about her.

The day’s highlight was the tape of Woodward’s June 13, 2003, interview with Armitage about how Bush decided to go to war. Armitage’s name was never supposed to be connected publicly to what he said. The scandal prompted him to release Woodward from his pledge of confidentiality, which freed Woodward to share the tape with lawyers in the case.

Armitage has said he revealed the name accidentally, off the cuff, and didn’t realize that Plame’s employment was classified information.

With Armitage’s frequent profanities deleted, the jurors heard him tell Woodward no less than four times where she worked.

Defense attorneys got Woodward, Novak, Pincus, New York Times reporter David Sanger, Washington Post reporter Glenn Kessler and Newsweek reporter Evan Thomas to say they had talked to Libby about Wilson’s allegations during the summer of 2003, but Libby had not disclosed Plame’s identity or employment to them.

But Sanger, Kessler and Thomas said they didn’t ask Libby about Wilson’s wife. Woodward and Novak testified they didn’t recall asking about her but said Libby didn’t talk about her if they did.

© Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email