WASHINGTON – Risking a political backlash, President Bush threw out the 2 1/2 -year prison sentence for former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby Monday but stopped short of giving him a full pardon.
The commutation pleased Libby’s conservative allies, but Democrats accused Bush of trampling the rule of law. Libby, convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice in the CIA leak case, still faces a $250,000 fine and two years probation. Unlike a pardon, a commutation does not forgive the underlying offense.
“I respect the jury’s verdict. But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive,” Bush said. The president spared Libby hours after a federal appellate court refused to let Libby remain free while he appealed his conviction.
Bush ignored the usual process for commutations, which calls for the Justice Department to review the case after the convicted felon reports to prison. The department’s guidelines say that commuting a sentence is “an extraordinary remedy that is rarely granted.”
Democrats expressed outrage.
“Until now, it appeared that the president merely turned a blind eye to a high-ranking administration official leaking classified information. The president’s action today makes it clear that he condones such activity,” said Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. “This decision is inconsistent with the rule of law and sends a horrible signal to the American people and our intelligence operatives who place their lives at risk every day.”
Republicans who had called for a full pardon welcomed Bush’s decision to ease the punishment. The president could still pardon Libby if his appeals fail.
“The betting line has to be that the president will pardon Scooter Libby on his last day in office,” Republican commentator Rich Galen said. “I thought he should have pardoned him last January, before the trial.”
Still, it wasn’t clear whether the commutation would have much political impact. Some analysts predicted that the decision simply reinforced well-established opinions about the president. Critics have another reason to dislike him. Admirers have another reason to support him.
“It’s a way for him to unite the troops – his political allies or people who should be his political allies,” said Dennis Goldford, a political science professor at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa.
Bush acknowledged the seriousness of the charges against Libby, who was convicted of lying to investigators trying to determine who leaked the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, contend that she was exposed in retaliation for his criticism of the Iraq war.
Testimony showed that Libby wasn’t the leaker, but he did discuss Plame’s CIA ties with reporters. The judge and the jury agreed with prosecutors that he lied repeatedly to investigators.
“If a person does not tell the truth, particularly if he serves in government and holds the public trust, he must be held accountable,” Bush said. “My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years of public service … is forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered immensely.”
Bush had vowed at the start of the investigation in 2003 to take a hard line against anyone involved in the leak. He ordered his staff to cooperate with investigators and threatened to fire the leaker.
“If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of,” he said then. “I want to know the truth.”
Vice President Dick Cheney issued a statement praising Libby without commenting on the commutation. He called Libby, who served as his chief of staff as well as an adviser to Bush, a person of integrity.
Federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, the chief investigator in Libby’s case, had argued for a stiff prison sentence for the defendant.
“Mr. Libby, a high-ranking public official and experienced lawyer, lied repeatedly and blatantly about matters at the heart of a criminal investigation concerning the disclosure of a covert intelligence officer’s identity,” Fitzgerald said in the sentencing phase of the trial last May. “He has shown no regret for his actions, which significantly impeded the investigation.”
In a statement Monday night, Fitzgerald took issue with Bush calling the sentence “excessive.”
“The sentence in this case was imposed pursuant to the laws governing sentencings, which occur every day throughout this country. In this case, an experienced federal judge considered extensive argument from the parties and then imposed a sentence consistent with the applicable laws,” Fitzgerald said.