Arrow-right Camera


Sex offenders may have to move

Thu., July 19, 2007

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – As many as 2,100 newly paroled sex offenders are living illegally near schools and parks under the tough residency requirements passed overwhelmingly by California voters last fall, the state corrections secretary said Wednesday.

The department will give the parolees 45 days to find new homes, a move that could spark renewed conflicts in communities throughout the state as sex offenders seek to comply with the law.

“We want to be public that we have some people who are out of compliance, but … we are fully committed, and the governor is fully committed, to complying with the housing component of Jessica’s Law,” James Tilton, director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said late Wednesday.

Tilton said the moves could leave some parolees homeless or force them to live in substandard housing.

Voters passed the Jessica’s Law ballot initiative last November with 70 percent approval. It prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park.

Opponents had warned that it would push sex offenders out of towns and cities, disproportionately affecting rural areas that would become a refuge for parolees. Corrections officials previously warned that the residency restrictions effectively prevent parolees from living in many of California’s cities.

“There are many communities where housing is a problem,” Tilton said.

The department recently completed a review of the registered addresses of sex offenders who have been paroled since the November election. Courts have ruled that the law can only apply to inmates freed after the measure was approved.

Late last month, it adopted the emergency regulation requiring parolees to move within 45 days if they violate the residency requirement. Parolees who refuse face the possibility of being sent back to prison for violation of their parole.

The department began reviewing the addresses after the co-author of Jessica’s Law, state Sen. George Runner, R-Lancaster, asked about the initiative’s implementation.


Click here to comment on this story »