March 1, 2007 in Nation/World

Judge rules Padilla is competent to stand trial

Peter Whoriskey Washington Post
 

MIAMI – A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Jose Padilla is competent to stand trial on terrorism charges, rejecting lawyers’ allegations that torture inflicted during his military incarceration has rendered him psychologically unable to mount a defense.

The ruling leaves aside for now the question of whether Padilla, accused of being an al-Qaida operative, was mistreated during his 3 1/2-year confinement in the Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., after being declared an “enemy combatant” by President Bush.

Instead, the ruling found that whether or not he was abused, Padilla is currently capable of understanding the legal proceedings and their consequences, and that he can assist his attorneys. That is enough under legal standards to find him fit for trial.

Neither the defense attorneys nor prosecutors would comment afterward.

In legal pleadings and an affidavit filed by Padilla’s attorneys on his behalf, the defense has asserted that during his stay at the brig, the 36-year-old was subject to isolation in a 7-by-9-foot cell with no view to the outside world, was deprived of sleep, a clock and reading materials, and was hooded and forced to assume “stress positions” for long periods of time. He was also, they alleged, threatened with imminent execution.

While U.S. officials say Padilla was treated humanely, a pending defense motion asks that the charges against him be thrown out because of mistreatment.

“Through its illegal conduct, the government has forfeited its right to prosecute,” according to the motion.

In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke said explicitly that the competency decision leaves open the questions raised by those allegations. “That discussion is for another day,” she said.

In arguing that Padilla is incompetent to stand trial, the defense had asserted that the alleged mistreatment made Padilla too fearful or too distracted to assist in his own defense – a defect that could render him legally incompetent.

Defense attorney Andrew Patel took the stand to testify that Padilla has consistently refused to review the taped conversations that are at the core of the prosecution case.

“We have gotten no useful information from Mr. Padilla, directly,” he said.

A forensic psychiatrist and a forensic psychologist hired by the defense had depicted Padilla as “broken man” who suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email