20 million chickens feared tainted
WASHINGTON – About 20 million chickens being raised for human consumption in several states ate feed made with melamine-tainted pet food and have been placed on a marketing hold to keep them from entering the food supply, Agriculture Department officials said Friday night.
The agency called for the “voluntary hold” late Friday, pending completion of a government risk analysis to determine whether the animals would be safe for people to eat.
The move, which involves major market brands, marked a significant escalation of the pet food scandal, which started with a few companion animals dying from food laced with tainted ingredients from China and has grown to reveal big cracks in the human food safety system.
Last week, government officials found evidence that as many as 345 pigs and perhaps 3 million broiler chickens may have been sold for human food after having eaten contaminated feed.
Food and Drug Administration officials have said they believe the health risks of eating meat from animals that were fed the contaminated material are very small.
The 20 million live chickens now being held were being raised for “large, brand name growers,” USDA spokesman Keith Williams said.
Since the chickens were being raised for well-known brands, they were being fed a blend that is higher quality than conventional chicken feed, Williams said. That means their food had a smaller percentage of pet food mixed in – and lower overall doses of melamine, the industrial chemical that was recently found to have been mixed with Chinese wheat gluten and rice protein. Those materials were then imported into the United States and incorporated into more than 100 brands of pet food.
Thousands of pet deaths are being investigated for possible links to the contamination, and 60 million packages of pet food have been recalled since March.
Perhaps because of that lower dose in the feed, initial tests have found no measurable traces of melamine in the chickens themselves, and the birds appear healthy – elements that Williams said were encouraging.
Usually, he said, an animal fed “adulterated” food is by definition an “adulterated animal” and cannot get USDA’s seal of inspection, a prerequisite for entering the commercial market. But in cases such as this, Williams said, in which government scientists have had time to gather large amounts of information about any actual risks, the agency believes it has the authority to release the animals for sale if the evidence for safety is compelling.