Funds sought to build ‘comfort capsules’
Air Force wanted counterterrorism money used
WASHINGTON – The Air Force’s top leadership sought for three years to spend counterterrorism funds on “comfort capsules” to be installed on military planes that ferry senior officers and civilian leaders around the world, with at least four top generals involved in design details such as the color of the capsules’ carpet and leather chairs, according to internal e-mails and budget documents.
Production of the first capsule – composed of two sealed rooms that can fit into the fuselage of a large military aircraft – and four mobile pallets containing plush, swiveling leather chairs with footrests has already begun.
Air Force officials say the government needs the new capsules to ensure that leaders can talk, work and rest comfortably in the air. But the top brass’s preoccupation with creating new luxury in wartime has alienated lower-ranking Air Force officers familiar with the effort, as well as congressional staff and a nonprofit group that calls the program a waste of money.
Air Force documents spell out how each of the capsules is to be “aesthetically pleasing and furnished to reflect the rank of the senior leaders using the capsule,” with beds, a couch, a table, a 37-inch flat-screen monitor with stereo speakers and a full-length mirror.
The effort has been slowed, however, by congressional resistance to using counterterrorism funds for the project and by lengthy internal deliberations about a series of demands for modifications by Air Force generals. One request was that the color of the leather for the seats and seat belts in the mobile pallets be changed from brown to Air Force blue and that seat pockets be added; another was that the color of the table’s wood be darkened.
Changing the seat color and pockets alone was estimated in a March 12 internal document to cost at least $68,240.
In all, for the past three years the service has asked to divert $16.2 million to the effort from what the military calls the GWOT, or global war on terrorism. Congress has twice told the service that it cannot, including an August 2007 letter from Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., to the Pentagon ordering that the money be spent on a “higher priority” need.
Officials say the Air Force nonetheless decided last year to take $331,000 from counterterrorism funds to cover a cost overrun, partly stemming from the design changes, although a senior officer said Thursday in response to inquiries that it will reverse that decision.
The internal Air Force e-mails, provided to the Washington Post by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), a nonprofit Washington group, and independently authenticated, make clear that lower-ranking officers involved in the project have been pressured to create what one described as “world class” accommodations exceeding the standards of a regular business-class flight.
“I was asked by Gen. (Robert H.) McMahon what it would take to make the (capsule) … a ‘world class’ piece of equipment,” an officer at the service’s Air Mobility Command said in a March 2007 e-mail to a colleague, referring to the mobility command’s top officer then. “He said he wanted an assurance … that we would be getting a world class item this week.”
Air Force officials say the program dates from a 2006 decision by Air Force Gen. Duncan McNabb that existing seats on transport planes, including some that match those on commercial airliners, may be fine for airmen but inadequate for the top brass. McNabb was then the Air Mobility commander; he is now the Air Force’s vice chief of staff, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates nominated him in June to become head of the military’s Transportation Command.
In a letter of complaint sent Thursday to Gates, POGO asserted that the new capsules will provide no special communications or work capabilities beyond those already available for top officials on Air Force transport aircraft. It is “a gross misuse of millions of taxpayer dollars that could otherwise be used to train and equip soldiers,” wrote Danielle Brian, the group’s executive director.
A military officer familiar with the program, who asked not to be named because he was not authorized to speak about it, likewise said that its extravagance has provoked widespread contempt among lower-ranking Air Force personnel. “This whole program is an embarrassment,” the officer said, particularly because transport seating for troops en route to the battlefield is in his view is generally shoddy.
The Air Force already has two trailers, known as “Silver Bullets,” that can be loaded aboard large transports for use by top military and civilian officers, plus a fleet of about 100 planes specifically meant for VIP travel. But McMahon, who is now the Air Force’s deputy chief of staff for Logistics, Installations and Mission Support, said the new program was started because the service ferried more “senior travelers” to distant regions after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and identified a “gap” in its capability.
It initially planned to build 10 of the capsules, he said, for use by four-star generals, fleet admirals and federal officials at the level of assistant secretary and above. “It is not opulent and it is not a box,” McMahon said, but meant to match the comfort level of the VIP fleet.
Explaining his instructions to subordinates, McMahon said he used the term world class “in just about everything I discuss. … That represents an attitude.”
Construction of what the Air Force initially termed the new Senior Leader In-transit Conference Capsules, or SLICC, has already begun, under a contract paid from general Air Force funds. One of the 18-by-9-foot capsules has been partly completed. But McMahon said the program has recently been downsized from 10 capsules to three, plus the four pallets fitted with swiveling leather chairs, known as Senior Leader In-transit Pallets (SLIP).
Because of the cutback in the number of capsules and pallets, the program is currently estimated to cost $7.6 million.