WASHINGTON – Menopausal women who took estrogen and progesterone faced a small increased risk for cancer for more than two years after they stopped, according to the latest results of a major federal study that has revealed a series of sobering findings about the once-popular hormone therapy.
The study of more than 15,000 women who took the hormones for more than five years found that the chance of developing cancer remained elevated well after they quit, which many did after an earlier stage of the study showed that the risks outweighed the benefits.
While their increased risk of heart attacks, blood clots and strokes appeared to vanish as soon as women got off the drugs, the cancer risk persisted. It appeared to be driven primarily by a continued increased rate of breast cancer but also by a new, unexpected higher risk of other malignancies, such as lung cancer, the analysis found.
“The question has been: Do the risks persist?” said Marcia Stefanick of Stanford University, who chairs the steering committee for the federally funded Women’s Health Initiative. “What this clearly shows is, unfortunately, the risk for cancer continues.”
Stefanick said the data appeared to show a real trend even though the breast cancer difference was not statistically significant, but other experts warned that finding could have been due to chance.
All the same, the findings underscore the now-standard recommendation that women who take hormones to relieve hot flashes and other effects of menopause should use the lowest possible dose for the shortest time, Stefanick said. And the millions of women who have taken the hormones should be monitored closely for cancer, especially breast cancer, she said.
It remains unclear how long the increased risk persists, she said, and researchers have continued following the women to try to answer that crucial question.
“This says, ‘You’re not quite safe yet, but let’s hope you’ll be safe soon,’ ” Stefanick said.
For years, doctors recommended that women take hormones to alleviate the symptoms of menopause and in the belief that the drugs would protect their hearts. But in 2002 researchers stunned doctors and women when they reported that the Women’s Health Initiative had not only found that the hormones did not protect the heart but actually increased the risk of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots and breast cancer.
The news prompted millions of women to stop taking the hormones, but until the new report, published in today’s issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, no one knew whether the higher risks would continue nevertheless.
The study involved 15,730 postmenopausal women ages 50 to 79 who took estrogen and progesterone for an average of 5.6 years. The researchers analyzed the data for an average of 2.4 years after they stopped and found that the risk of heart disease and blood clots dropped back to about the same level as in women who had been taking a placebo. The risk of stroke also appeared to fall, but that finding was somewhat less clear.
But the researchers were surprised to find that the overall risk of cancer was 24 percent higher in women who took hormones compared with those who took an inert placebo: 281 of those who had taken hormones developed some type of cancer, compared with 218 in the placebo group. That appeared to be driven by a 27 percent increased risk of breast cancer, although that difference did not meet a test of statistical significance. There were 79 breast cancers in the hormone group, compared with 60 in the placebo group.
Stefanick said she believed that “breast cancer is really driving” the overall increased cancer risk.
“People were under the impression that once you stop the hormones your risk for breast cancer goes down,” Stefanick said. “This is saying, ‘No that’s not the case. It continues.’ It is bad news.”
Other researchers noted that the increased risks found by the new analysis were very small or questionable and worried the findings might frighten women who really need hormones for short periods.
“I see a lot of patients who are really miserable – whose interpersonal relationships are harmed, whose careers have suffered,” said Hugh S. Taylor of Yale University School of Medicine. “It’s a fairly small risk, and when women hear about this it plays to their fears. I think they are suffering needlessly because of an exaggerated risk.”
If nothing else, the gatherings in Cleveland and Philadelphia helped identify just who you no longer need to follow on Twitter.
PREDATORS -- A predator management project is hitting a few snags, according to National Geographic: Research-driven mountain lion management taking hold in Wyoming Since 2007, Wyoming has been aggressively trying ...
Singer Carole King, a long-time resident of Idaho, performs during the final day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia earlier today. King, whose hits include "You've Got A Friend," ...
Idaho Congressman Raul Labrador is the sixth-poorest member of Congress, according to a comparison by InsideGov.com, with an average net worth, based on his federal financial disclosures, of minus $216,000. ...
sponsored According to two 2015 surveys, 62 percent of Americans do not have enough savings to handle an unexpected emergency, much less any long-term plans.