McCain, Obama spar on Iraq troop numbers

MILWAUKEE – Republican John McCain’s estimate of U.S. troop levels in Iraq touched off squabbling with Democrat Barack Obama on Friday, the latest turn in the presidential rivals’ escalating disagreement over the war.

The likely GOP nominee told an audience Thursday: “We have drawn down to pre-surge levels. Basra, Mosul and now Sadr City are quiet.”

Obama responded: “That’s not true and anyone running for commander in chief should know better.”

In fact, U.S. troop levels are not yet down to levels before President Bush’s troop increase last year, a strategy shift McCain had pushed for some four years before the president authorized it.

There were 15 combat brigades in Iraq before the increase began. Five were added, and the United States has been reducing numbers since December. As of Friday, there are 17 brigades in Iraq, another brigade will depart in June and the plan is to pull out another in July, returning the level to 15.

Before the increase, there were 130,000-135,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. As of this week, that number was 155,000, and the Pentagon plans to drop that to 140,000 by the end of July.

The McCain campaign blamed a parsing of verb tense and semantics. But McCain, himself, insisted Friday that he didn’t misspeak.

“Of course not. I said we’ve drawn down,” the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee said at a news conference. “The rest of them will be home at the end of July.”

Obama seized on McCain’s insistence that he didn’t misspeak. “Today, Senator McCain refused to acknowledge that he had made a mistake,” Obama said at a rally Friday in Great Falls. “Just like George Bush, when he was presented with the truth, he just dug in and refused to admit his mistake.”

McCain tried to turn the tables on Obama, reading a quote from October 2007 in which Obama said the increase strategy would exacerbate sectarian violence. Top U.S. commanders have credited the force increase with helping curb violence.

“Clearly, Senator Obama made exactly the wrong judgment about whether the surge would succeed in Iraq,” McCain said. “He has no fundamental understanding of the entire situation that warranted the surge.”

McCain’s comments – and Democratic criticism of them – continued a week of haggling over the Iraq war with Obama, who is expected to clinch the Democratic nomination. The war is certain to be a major issue in the general election because McCain advocates a continued troop presence in Iraq but Obama calls for a withdrawal.

A Vietnam prisoner of war, McCain relishes a debate on national security in a difficult election year for Republicans. Obama, a first-term Illinois senator, meanwhile sees an opening on the war, given that most of the public now opposes it.

Both have been arguing that the other lacks the judgment to be commander in chief.

McCain points to Obama’s limited foreign policy experience, and this week he questioned Obama’s two-year-absence from Iraq. Obama, who said he was considering a trip there, questions whether McCain is fit to lead on Iraq. Obama’s campaign points to what they call McCain’s too-rosy assessments of the war, a previous gaffe over the difference between Sunnis and Shiites – and, now, his troop-level comment.

Democrats pounced on it early Friday, with Obama’s campaign arranging a conference call with two high-profile surrogates.

Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle, an Obama supporter, argued that McCain was misrepresenting the facts when he said that the U.S. military has returned to levels before last year’s force increase in Iraq. “That just is just not true. And everybody knows it’s not true. And I assume Senator McCain just doesn’t know the facts here,” Doyle said in a conference call with reporters.