November 8, 2008 in Nation/World

Joblessness points to deep recession

U.S. unemployment jumps to 6.5 percent, a 14-year high
By Maura Reynolds Los Angeles Times
 

Inside

Idaho jobless rate continues to climb/A10

WASHINGTON – The credit crisis has eased, but the bad news for the American worker may just be beginning.

Employers slashed jobs from one end of the economy to the other in October, pushing the unemployment rate to 6.5 percent. That’s the highest level in 14 years, and makes a deep recession a virtual certainty.

No sector of the economy was immune from the decline. The biggest losses were in manufacturing and construction, but they were joined last month by big cuts in retail trade, financial services, and leisure and hospitality.

“It seems that firms had previously been cutting back employment only gradually, being cautious on hiring but not aggressive on firing,” said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist with consulting firm Global Insight. “They have now decided that the recession will be deeper than feared and are acting more aggressively on firing, as they see demand for their products falling rapidly.”

Employers shed 240,000 jobs in October, and the toll in September was far worse than previously recorded: 284,000, up from an initial reading of 159,000.

The economy must normally create about 100,000 jobs a month just to keep pace with population growth. So far this year, the economy has shrunk by nearly 1.2 million jobs, according to the Labor Department.

That pushed the unemployment rate 0.4 percent higher in one month, rising from 6.1 percent in September to 6.5 percent in October.

Even two of the more robust employment sectors – health care and government, which pays for public servants including teachers and police – grew more slowly than in the past.

The last time the unemployment rate was so high was in March 1994 when the economy was still struggling to recover from a recession.

The situation facing workers is even worse when so-called discouraged workers are factored in – 11.8 percent in October, the Labor Department estimated, up from 11 percent in September. Officially the unemployment rate counts only those who have lost employment and are actively looking for new work; it does not include those who have stopped trying or are working part-time.

Jared Bernstein, a labor economist with the Economic Policy Institute, noted that job losses are a “lagging” phenomenon. That is, unemployment tends to peak well after the economic shocks that cause it, and take longer to abate even after the economy recovers.

He noted that the lag has lengthened in recent business cycles, taking roughly two years after a recession for the economy to regain the lost jobs.

“Employers often wait to be sure that the economy is really tanking before laying people off in earnest. And they want to be quite sure that consumers are back before they take on other workers,” Bernstein said. “Unfortunately, that lag has gotten a lot longer in recent years.”

Deteriorating conditions for U.S. workers are likely to intensify calls for Congress to pass another economic stimulus package.

“When the private sector engine stalls, the public sector engine needs to kick in,” Bernstein said.

A critical factor in a recovery will be whether recent financial shocks have forced consumers to rethink spending and savings habits.

Americans appear to be increasing their savings for the first time in years, said Ed Leamer, director of the University of California, Los Angeles, Anderson Forecast. That is probably wise for consumers whose assets have lost value and workers fearful of losing their jobs, but it robs the economy of its major driver: about 70 percent of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product is consumer spending.

Leamer said much of last spring’s stimulus payments went to savings or paying down debt, and consumers are more inclined now to save extra cash, not spend it.

The trick in devising a new stimulus, he said, would be to help consumers spend a little more in the short run while learning to increase savings over time.

“It’s important not to panic the consumer,” Leamer said. “The short-term problem is too little spending, and the longer term problem is too much spending. … A nice little gradual increase in saving is what we should be doing.”

But in the long run, he said, the economy will not return to health until spending and saving are in better balance and Americans produce more and consume less.

“We’re in an economy that’s going to experience a structural adjustment,” Leamer said. “We need to convert some of our malls into factories.”


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email