November 20, 2008 in Nation/World

scientists envision Mammoth’s return

They’re using ancient hair to unravel beast’s DNA
By SETH BORENSTEIN Associated Press
 
Associated Press photo

This computer-generated image shows a prehistoric woolly mammoth, which could be re-created in as little as a decade.
(Full-size photo)

WASHINGTON – Scientists have deciphered much of the genetic code of the woolly mammoth, a feat they say could allow them to re-create the shaggy, prehistoric beast in as little as a decade.

The project marks the first time researchers have spelled out the DNA of an extinct species, and it raised the possibility that other ancient animals such as mastodons and sabertooth tigers might someday walk the Earth again.

“It could be done. The question is, just because we might be able to do it one day, should we do it?” asked Stephan Schuster, a Penn State University biochemist and co-author of the new research. “I would be surprised to see if it would take more than 10 or 20 years to do it.”

The million-dollar mammoth study resulted in a first draft of the animal’s genome, detailing the ice age creature’s more than 3 billion DNA building blocks. The research published in today’s issue of the journal Nature also gives scientists new clues about evolution and extinction.

“This is an amazing achievement,” said Alex Greenwood, an Old Dominion University biology professor who studies ancient DNA and was not involved in the mammoth research.

Full-sized mammoths, about 8 to 14 feet tall, became extinct around 10,000 years ago.

To obtain the DNA, scientists relied on 20 balls of mammoth hair found frozen in the Siberian permafrost. That technique – along with major improvements in genome sequencing and the emerging field of synthetic biology – is helping biologists envision a science-fiction future.

Past efforts to analyze ancient DNA often used material extracted from fossilized bones, which frequently became contaminated with bacteria, viruses and parasites over thousands of years.

For example, efforts to study Neanderthal DNA have been hampered because only about 6 percent of the recovered genetic material actually belonged to humans’ ancient cousins.

The new study, which is about 80 percent complete, provides a letter-by-letter genetic code mapping out most of the mammoth’s DNA. Think of it as an instruction sheet on how to build a mammoth. Scientists don’t yet know how to do that, but experts say eventually they will.

Schuster said researchers should someday be able to re-create any extinct creature that lived within the past 100,000 years, as long as it got trapped in permafrost and had hair.

That leaves out the Jurassic period, the time of dinosaurs, from about 140 million to 200 million years ago. So Earth’s real-life sequel to extinction is far more likely to be “Ice Age 3” than “Jurassic Park IV.”

Three years ago, Japanese scientists said they hoped to find frozen mammoth sperm and impregnate an elephant and raise the offspring in a safari park in Siberia. But using genetics to engineer a mammoth makes more sense, Schuster said.

There are two possible ways to use this new genetic map to make a mammoth, and both involve creating a mammoth embryo and implanting it into its elephant cousin. Both methods rely on intricate genetic manipulation because the mammoth DNA is not suitable for cloning.

One approach requires scientists to start with an elephant cell and genetically engineer it to match the DNA code of a mammoth.

The other method involves synthetic biology in which scientists would create life forms from scratch. Once this technique is developed – leaders in the field say it is just three to 10 years away – scientists would follow the mammoth recipe to build a mammoth cell.

An easier option would be to examine what makes the mammoth different from its closest cousin, the African elephant, and create a hairy hybrid to sit in zoos. “People would like to see a hairy elephant,” said George Church, director of computational genomics at Harvard Medical School.

The more practical side of the research is to better illustrate the evolutionary differences between mammoths and elephants, and even humans and chimps, said Church, who was not part of the study.

© Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Thoughts and opinions on this story? Click here to comment >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email