October 20, 2008 in Nation/World

Stevens faces two juries: one in court, one on Election Day

By TOM HAYS and MATT APUZZO Associated Press
 

WASHINGTON – When Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens first took the witness stand, it was with his familiar vigor and spunk.

It would be “a privilege and duty” to testify, he told the judge in a firm voice. The senator then crisply recounted what supporters see as a personal history unparalleled in politics.

Later, however, in the midst of often arduous testimony about possible corruption, came this moment of imprecision from the 84-year-old lawmaker: “I can’t read my own writing,” Stevens mumbled, struggling to read aloud a note he had written a friend.

The conflicting snapshots of the longest-sitting Republican senator do not just matter in the Washington courtroom where he has been on trial for nearly a month on charges he lied about more than $250,000 in free home renovations and other gifts.

Stevens’ performance during two days on the stand last week could sway what has been called a second jury: the Alaska voters who on Nov. 4 will deliver a verdict on whether he should keep a position he has held for 40 years.

Like jurors, voters have to decide which Stevens they believe. It is the razor-sharp politician who easily gushed dates, facts and figures about a proposed Alaska natural pipeline? Or the agitated defendant who struggled to come up with an answer when teased by a prosecutor, “You can’t remember when somebody put in a big, old bulky staircase at your house that you didn’t ask for?”

With the polls close and Stevens stuck in the courtroom, his Democratic opponent, Mark Begich, has taunted him from afar. The Anchorage mayor accuses the senator of ducking debates and uses his legal predicament against him. Democratic ads pepper the Alaska airwaves, including one featuring dramatized FBI agents listening to the senator’s calls.

“Something has gone terribly wrong,” the narrator of one ad says. “Ted Stevens: It’s not about Alaska anymore.”

Stevens pushed for a speedy trial in hopes of clearing his name before Election Day of charges he purposely failed to disclose on Senate financial forms the renovations and freebies from his friend Bill Allen, the former chief of oil services company VECO Corp.

The senator says his wife, Catherine, paid every bill received by the couple for the modernization of their Alaska cabin – $160,000 in all. He also claims Allen kept the couple in the dark about the extent of the work and its cost.

The Alaska Democratic Party has dissected the defense, accusing Stevens’ lawyers of trying to “razzle and dazzle” the jury by calling former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch and other famous friends of the senator as character witnesses.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has piled on as well, urging voters in an e-mail message to vote for Begich so Democrats can reach a “filibuster-proof” majority – 60 Democrats.

“Ted Stevens will face two juries,” Reid wrote. “The first will determine whether or not he is guilty of (corruption charges). The second will be the voters of Alaska, who have the opportunity to tell him they are tired of corruption.”

While prosecutors are only playing to one jury, their tactics may have at times benefited Stevens with Alaska voters. Stevens’ supporters say he is being railroaded by prosecutors run amok, and the Justice Department did plenty to bolster that argument, repeatedly being scolded by a judge for withholding evidence or otherwise impeding Stevens’ defense.

David Dittman, an Alaska Republican pollster, said that after a year of constant media coverage about the investigation, the trial has only helped Stevens.

“Absent a chance to defend himself, he’d be much worse off,” Dittman said.

© Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus