Nebraska governor urges remake of ‘Safe Haven’ law
Measure’s wording makes it very broad
LINCOLN, Neb. – Deciding he could wait no longer to address what has become a state embarrassment, Gov. Dave Heineman said Wednesday he will call a special legislative session to amend Nebraska’s loosely worded safe-haven law, which in just a few months has allowed parents to abandon nearly two dozen children as old as 17.
Heineman had planned to wait until the next regular legislative session convened in January but changed his mind as the number of children dropped off at hospitals grew. Two teenagers were abandoned Tuesday night alone, and three children dropped off previously did not even live in Nebraska.
“We’ve had five in the last eight days,” Heineman said in explaining why he called a special session. “We all hoped this wouldn’t happen.”
The special session will begin Nov. 14. That’s less than two months before the regular legislative session, but the governor and others see a need to act quickly.
“This law needs to be changed to reflect its original intent” to protect infants, Heineman said during a news conference Wednesday.
The law, which was signed by Heineman in February and took effect in July, prohibits parents from being prosecuted for leaving a child at a hospital.
Use of the word “child” was a compromise after legislators disagreed about what age limit to set, but that decision made Nebraska’s safe-haven law the broadest in the nation by far. Most states have age limits ranging from 3 days to about a month.
As of Wednesday 23 children had been left at Nebraska hospitals, including nine from one family and children from Iowa, Michigan and Georgia. Many are teenagers, only one is younger than 6, and none are babies.
Most Nebraska lawmakers have agreed upon revisions that would put an age limit of 3 days on infants who could be dropped off at hospitals.
Veteran legislator Ernie Chambers, of Omaha, who opposes safe-haven laws and is skilled at killing laws he doesn’t like, said Wednesday that he will not obstruct passage of the revision.
“It is terrible for children at those ages that are being dropped off to be deserted and abandoned,” he said. “I think the governor has made a very wise decision.”
Not everyone agrees, including the current law’s main sponsor. Sen. Arnie Stuthman, of Platte Center, had wanted a 3-day age limit in his bill but opposes a rush to change the law.
“The big problem is we need to address what there seems to be a need for,” Stuthman said. “It seems like people aren’t able to get services for these older kids.”
© Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.