April 9, 2009 in Idaho
Human rights commissioner’s views prompt debate
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Senate Democrats opposed reconfirming northern Idaho Republican Ruthie Johnson to the nine-member Commission on Human Rights after she said employers should be able to fire workers for wearing clothing meant for the opposite sex.
Seven Democrats Thursday opposed Johnson, with 28 Republicans favoring her reappointment. Debate lasted about an hour.
The panel protects persons in Idaho from illegal discrimination and also handles federal complaints. Minority Leader Kate Kelly, from Boise, contends Johnson’s views aren’t expansive enough to merit another three-year term.
At her April 3 confirmation hearing, the 85-year-old Johnson, of Hayden Lake, was asked if gays should be protected from workplace discrimination.
She responded, “If someone comes to work dressed in drag, they should be able to fire them,” according to meeting minutes. She also stated that it would “change our culture” if sexual orientation were added to Idaho’s Human Rights Act, a move the commission has supported in the past, but this year voted narrowly to oppose, and that she objects to such a change.
Johnson was first appointed in 2001.


Order your "Fish Playing Poker" print
Enter for a chance to win a fancy DTE water bottle!
GoGolf Virtual tour is Back! Round 1 - 2 prizes/ 1 contest/ 2 winners!
Win 2 tickets to the Knitting Factory!
Win a $25.00 gift certificate to Auntie’s Bookstore
slfisher on April 09 at 2:10 p.m.
“She also stated that it would “change our culture” if sexual orientation were added to Idaho’s Human Rights Act,”
I think that's the idea.
Flag as inappropriate
darcyism on April 09 at 2:32 p.m.
Funny thing is, the culture has already changed…they are just reminiscing…
Flag as inappropriate
bluegirlredstate on April 09 at 2:54 p.m.
I hope I'm not that stupid when I'm 85.
Flag as inappropriate
BRR on April 09 at 6:05 p.m.
She argues well for an age limit or at least a competence test. Is this Annie Oakley come back to shoot the bad people?
Flag as inappropriate